Help with value and information on 1952 Seamaster CD2767 Calibre 354 Honeycomb Dial

Hi,

With the passing of my grandfather six years ago I inherited an Omega Seamaster watch. At the time I didn't know too much about, other than it looked (and felt) like a nice quality watch.

I took the watch to Fraser Hart at the Metrocentre in Gateshead and they sent it off to Swiss Time Services for a full service and restoration (to bring back to new, but maintaining orginality).

Along with the watch after the works were done i recieved information regarding the watch:-

1952 Omega Seamaster, CD2767, Calibre 354, Serial Number 13969472, Honeycomb Dial (off white), Double Gold batons at 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'colck, single batons everywhere else.

I have just had the watch serviced again at Omega in Switzerland, 15th February 2019.

I have tried to find another watch the same, but have not seen anything with the same baton configuration. I have contacted both Swiss Time Services and the Guild of Valuers, and been told that they have not seen another with the same configuration.

I contacted Somlo of London for more information and a valuation, but the cannot value as the watch was not purchased from them. They were able to tell me that in 12 years they have only had one watch the same (back when the store opened in 2007) The have told me that the honeycomb dial is not as common as the standard two tone dial, and that there were different variations of the Seamaster in the early days (not as uniform a production as now).

I have been told that it may be worth contacting the Omega Museum for an extract regarding my watch, but I am wondering if anyone out there can help me.

Do I have a rare model, given the dial and baton configuration? Were there many produced with the same design? What would be the value (or where should I go to) given that it is in mint condition, particularly for its age. Would it be possible to find out where the watch was purchased initially?

Sadly I cannot ask family as there is no one alive who would know.

The guild of valuers have provided a replacement valuation (for a modern watch as mine is no longer made - which I have yet to receive).

I don't particularly want to sell the watch, but i would like to know as much as possible about it, and what the value would be in todays market.

I am not the best with technology, but will try to post pictures or can email.

Grateful for any help anyone can give.

Darren

First hit on google image search on that reference is this old sales ad:

https://www.watches.co.uk/archived-watch/15437/omega-vintage-seamaster-cd2767/

... Same reference, same configuration, with travel case like yours , serviced at STS in 2013 like yours.

Is there something you are not telling us here?

Good catch

Sorry.....this is mine. I made a huge mistake in parting with it when suffering with poor health and deeply regretted it. Fortunately I was able to buy it back (the shop had the details of the person who bought it from them). Still suffering with health, but at that time i was VERY ill, physically and mentally.

Yes, foolish. Yes, I got stung and lost out financially. Yes, very glad to have back in my possession.

As per my original post, again, any information would be gratefully accepted.

Oh, the strap the watch has now is different to that in the pictures from google. I had asked for the watch to have the original style it would have had new.

So, again, never seen another one like it.

What's in the parts bag from Omega? I think I see the crystal but there's something else in there that looks like a case back.

After all those selling/buying operations you should know its "value in today markets" much better than any of us.

Thanks efauser - I'll hopefully be able to tell you tomorrow as I'll ask the jewellers who sent the watch to Omega for servicing for a copy of the service report.

My mobile phone camera is not the best, but I've attached pictures of my Seamaster taken today.

Is it a honeycomb or waffle 'textured' dial?

I've contacted the Omega Museum and cost of an extract is 120 francs. What they have said is they cannot tell me how many watches were produced with the same dial / baton configuration.

What i do know is model CD2767, Calibre 354, Serial Number 13969472, Year 1952.

Is it one of the more uncommon variations?

Fully restored (apart from Gold Capping which I was told cannot be done - correct me if that is wrong) and serviced twice. Wanted watch back to as new condition without losing the originality.

Opinions please?

Top left where strap and case meet is reflections not scratches / marks.

Hi

As far as the recapping is concerned I’ve had a watch recapped by RePlateit.com in Canada and I was really pleased with the results.

Regards
Chris

Here’s my 2657 Jumbo seamaster chronometer I think it tells you what members are talking about as to originality
It’s a well held belief that omega should not be allowed anywhere near their vintage pieces

As per letter from Simon Freese of STS 24th September 2013:-

Service work entailed complete dismantling of the mechanism, ultrasonic cleaning of all movement components, replacing any worn or defective parts as necessary. The mechanism was then rebuilt, lubricated to manufacturer's specifications and elctronically timed. A new set of hands was fitted and the dial restored. The case was ultrasonically cleaned, tidied up as best as possible and fitted with a new Omega crown, glass and brown calf leather strap (new one fitted since then to match what would have had originally).

Are you saying that STS have devalued the watch in carrying out the resoration / full service?

As far as I am aware the second service by Omega involved internal workings only.

Opinions again, as I asked and wanted for the watch to be brought back to as new condition (or as close as possible) without affecting the originality.

The dial when I originally came by the watch was not in the best of conditions - as you say, time and circumstance.

What I wanted was to get the watch back to the best possible working condition without compromising it's authenticity / originality. I didn't want an overly restored watch that looked nothing like it did when first made. Not being an expert in these matters I put my faith / trust in STS to do this.

Would it be worth me going back to STS and asking them to fit original hands?

From a sentimental perspective the watch means a lot to me - as far as I know it has been in my family since new. I just wanted to get it back to original condition and working order. If this is not the case, then that is not what I asked for.

Interesting, I am a newbie here, but I have a very similar Seamaster, a touch later serial number, with a black waffle dial.
What I find interesting is this is the first vintage Omega I have seen like mine, with the the double batons at 12, single batons at 3,6, and 9 and pointers at the rest of the spots.
Never had this one restored, been in a box since 1974 when my dad passed, except for one servicing.

No, your opinion is not unwelcome - I asked.

I didn't join the forum looking to sell. I came here trying to find out more about my watch - rare, common, value, like / dislike, etc.

I mention Somlo as STS said they could perhaps provide me with more information regarding the watch - original, rare / common, value.

Yes, it means a lot to me, and that is why I have spent money getting it restored and serviced - and buying it back (where I lost out alot).

I imagine like most others on the forum money is not limitless, and I have other expenses (particularly in regards to my ongoing health issues). I want to keep my watch in the best possible condition and working order, but not where it becomes uneconomical to do so. As you will know, servicing is not cheap and at what point do you stop paying £300 / £500 / £800 for servicing if for example your watch is only worth £500?

I have only come here to this forum for help. As i have said, all I wanted was to carefully and sympathetically restore my watch, keeping things authentic and original where possible.

I sold it (at a time of great mental and physical stress), regretted it, and bought it back.

If because of me putting my trust and faith in Fraser Hart, STS and Omega the originality / authenticity of my watch has been destroyed and subsequently devalued then I think I have a right to feel let down.

I do not consider it wrong to be asking if I have something a little less common, given that i have not seen another like it.

I know it is a long time ago, but sorry to hear about your father. Wonderful to have his watch as a touchstone. It is the one in your avatar? It looks sweet. Can you post a pic that shows the hands better?