Help with Speedmaster 145.022

All - I'm relatively new to the forum. I have been studying vintage speedmasters for about 6 months now trying to figure out the reference I am most interested in. I've narrowed it down to the 145.022, preferably 69-71. I have been watching ebay and other sites for watches. I have found that pulling the trigger is a little harder than I thought given I question whether I know enough to discern whether the watch is legit or a lemon. Was wondering if I could ask for your collective help on the following. If there is a better thread for this, let me know.

Watch #1

http://www.ebay.com/itm/132093850476?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
- Despite being a little banged up, which I kind of like, this one seems to have the correct caseback, bezel, and a logical serial. The only issue I have is that chrono hand - looks like something from a Mark maybe?

Watch #2

http://www.ebay.com/itm/351981656629?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
- Bezel is a 220
- No mention of serial, so don't know
- Case looks maybe too nice for the age?
- Hands look like tritium hands - question, is it common for the tritium color on the hands and the dial to not match, even if the hands are original?

Watch #3

http://www.ebay.com/itm/172532027685?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
- This one seems like a really nice one
- 220 bezel
- case, serial, bezel, and hands all seem to be the right time period

Mostly looking to hear if anyone sees something in these watches that stands out as a major red flag. While all of them have a couple things I could take issue with, they seem to be good watches.

I'd go with the first one. The bracelet makes up for the hands and those can be sorted out by a good watchmaker pretty easily.

Thanks guys - appreciate the color and guidance. Will keep you posted if I pull the trigger. #1 is the only one I think I would consider at this point.

Saw #2 and #3 before. Someone is hoping to cash in on the bezel craze with the 220's. They should not be anywhere close to those prices as mentioned already. As a reference, I paid just tad under $3K for my 69 with ghost DN90 bezel about a month ago.

All - one more I am curious to get feedback on.

The ebay listing says its a 1974, but it is a 71 ST from what I can tell. Case back, stepped dial, bezel, and serial (32.3X) all seem correct for the 71 ST reference. My question is on the lume plots - some are smudgy and appear to creep outside the underlying index markers - is this a relume or do you think this is original? Asking price seems a little rich, but seems like a good one to me.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/162401988754?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

I really don't know enough to help you in your decision making, but once pointed out those gloopy plots do distract (in these photos) ... I feel it's a bit of a shame because it otherwise looks lovely. Can you get to see it in the metal?

I agree, the lune looks original to the watch. I personally like the patina.

#4 wait for a good Speedy to show up on this forum...

Thanks all. @Overgrower I certainly don't mind the patina - I actually prefer the darker hue. I was more concerned about the "smudgy" appearance, but @abrod520 is probably right about humidity. All said, I think the seller is asking way too much at this point...

Seller is a member on Rolex forum. And his listing is https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=515488