Dial is DEFINITELY a redial
Care to elaborate?
looks to have been polished up on the rotor weight and bridge, bracelet isn’t genuine and for 650 euro you can definitely find a better example.
I don’t fully understand the comment re polished rotor / bridge. Movement looks fine to me.
The bracelet isn’t Omega, true, but it’s nice enough. I‘m not quite sure how much „better“ you can do for 650€. You can get a
nice 60s Genève for that money, sure. But a good chronometer 2577/2767 is easily 1k+. 650 is about what rather shabby examples fetch.
An alternative perspective is parts value.
200-250 for the case, 200-250 for the movement, 50 for the hand set, 50 for indices and crown brings us close to 600 already. Leaves a dial, which will fetch a couple €/$/£ too…
It looks like something is going on around the indices, so I, too, would appreciate better pics of the dial if I was looking for an attractive watch.
Matter of taste if one finds this watch attractive. But one thing is surely isn’t is bad value for money. Now, that doesn’t necessarily give you a watch you enjoy wearing, but „you can do a lot better for 650“ isn’t a fair valuation to me. „Possibly not the best entry into vintage“ Sounds more like it, as I assume disassembling the watch and selling it in parts to recoup the money isn’t the plan.
LA is indeed incorrect by the way, should be 49. But an amplitude of 235ish also isn’t overly bad for those bumpers. BE isn’t great, true. Bottom line re service: Certainly wasn’t great work, but at 650€, what are you expecting.
