Forums Latest Members
  1. JimJupiter Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Will get my extract :) Museum confirmed that case and sn matches, they really have a "hole" in some serial number ranges. They are working on making more serials available. My guess is, they start to digitalize the old books.

    Nico
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  2. mr_yossarian Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
    Excellent news I'd say!!
     
    JimJupiter likes this.
  3. JimJupiter Feb 15, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    It's been a while. Today my Ed White came back to me. The watch go a new dial, matching hands and bracelet. I really dig the ghost bezel, reminds me of the "Army Twins" :D

    DSC_4965.JPG
     
    US-Army-Twins.jpg
    Edited Feb 15, 2018
  4. fibonacci086 Feb 15, 2018

    Posts
    779
    Likes
    3,598
    Congrats on finishing your project ! The twin approves !
    twin.jpg
     
    Etp095, Davidt, bags1971 and 4 others like this.
  5. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Feb 15, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Where did you find the dial? Dark corners or out in the open?
     
  6. JimJupiter Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Out in the open. The price was higher as the price of the watch itself ;). Markers were washed out, so I send it to Adam for relume. I am just not sure If i am satisfied with that work
     
  7. neilfrancis Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    586
    Likes
    1,498
    Why so?
     
  8. JimJupiter Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    I think you can see it better in daylight. Some of the markers are like little “worms”

    3B1DB3A7-0FA2-4181-A711-E10C85DA14B5.jpeg
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  9. mr_yossarian Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
    whoa, Nico..sorry to see that, really a bit dissapointing.
     
  10. neilfrancis Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    586
    Likes
    1,498
    This is very interesting. I wish neither to condone nor condemn this work, but I do know from conversations with @Spacefruit that the lume on 105002s and I think 105003s can be 'wobbly' in a way that doesn't appear on other references. I have seen it close up on one or two of his fully original watches. Perhaps worth investigating? There might be an argument for saying that this kind of finish is entirely appropriate for this dial.
     
  11. JimJupiter Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    I found this early 003 on his page with the following quote: "Note also the “wobbly lume”. This original feature of 105.003’s is quite common and often leads people to think the dial has been relumed. It is an original feature only seen in this reference, although not an attractive one."

    1-P5020001-003-e1500579705674.jpg
     
    Etp095, watchyouwant and neilfrancis like this.
  12. neilfrancis Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    586
    Likes
    1,498
    So my take is... either way you go, you can’t go wrong. All down to your personal preference.

    FWIW, I think your watch looks terrific.


     
    oddboy and JimJupiter like this.
  13. padders Oooo subtitles! Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    8,998
    Likes
    13,944
    My 105.003-65 has slightly wobbly lume too and is fully original AFAIK.

    9B07C305-085A-48A6-92E8-FAF7F7EA6535.jpeg
     
    Etp095, Tubber, neilfrancis and 3 others like this.
  14. bags1971 Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,844
    Likes
    3,818
    Padders yours is stunning
     
    padders likes this.
  15. bags1971 Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,844
    Likes
    3,818
    it looks pretty good from what i can see
     
    neilfrancis and padders like this.
  16. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    +1, looks good. any before pics of the dial?
     
  17. JimJupiter Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Yep:

    dial2.jpg
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  18. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    big improvement, no? I'd give it a little time. Wear for a while and see how you like it. If it continues to bug you, start the hunt for an original one, and be prepared to drop ~$4K on it.
     
  19. JimJupiter Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    What do you mean with original one? Do you see anything else wrong...except for the lume :D Btw, this one wasnt cheap either...
     
  20. bags1971 Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,844
    Likes
    3,818