Help needed: assessing authenticity of my Omega Seamaster 166.009

Hi everyone, I’m new to this forum and hoping to learn from the community here.

I recently purchased an Omega Seamaster 166.009 from a private seller who seemed reliable and assured me that the watch was original and had not been refinished. While it initially appeared to be in good condition, closer inspection has revealed some inconsistencies that make me question its originality. I didn’t open the back of the watch before purchasing, which might have provided more clarity, but I trusted the seller’s description at the time.

The watch looked great, and I wanted to believe I’d found a hidden gem. Now, I’m starting to think I might have found a well-hidden lesson instead 🤦🏻‍♂️

Here’s what I’ve observed:

1. Several hour markers (around 4, 5, 6, and 7 o’clock) appear slightly misaligned with the printed minute track.
2. After the 1-hour marker, the minute track itself seems uneven, especially in the lower half of the dial.

Could these alignment issues be the result of a refinished dial, manufacturing imperfections, or age-related wear?

Based on the attached photos and my description, does this watch appear fully original, or are these inconsistencies signs of refinishing or other modifications?

I’d be grateful for any insights you can share.
Thank you!

Thank you Dan! I really appreciate your input and the reference photos.

I’ve brought these concerns to the seller, but they remain confident the watch is as they described and mentioned that they purchased it from a reputable merchant on Chrono24, who did not disclose anything about refinishing.

Assuming that’s where things stand, how would you suggest I proceed with the watch?

In your experience, as people who appreciate small details and craftsmanship, how do you come to terms with imperfections like this and still find joy in the piece, even if it’s not 100% what you expected? I’m trying to see this situation in a different light and would love to hear your thoughts.