Forums Latest Members
  1. Kingnaffer Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Hi there,

    I'm new to the forum and would appreciate any help you could offer. I have been given the opportunity to purchase the watch shown in the photo from a friend of the family. I have been told it was purchased in 1966. Does it look original and do you have any idea of a fair value. The original strap is not included. Thanks in advance.
     
    image.jpeg
  2. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    17,107
    Likes
    25,353
    The Bezel is post 1970 and that is all I can say lol.

    I am sure the speedieistas can give more info, but your really going to need show the case back and first digits of the serial number on the movement if you want really detailed information.
     
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    26,999
    Likes
    32,718
    It looks like it was probably a 105.003 thats been serviced, in that it lost its original dial, hands, bezel, and most likely crown and pushers. That's a huge amount of the value of the watch wiped out.
     
  4. Kingnaffer Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Thanks for your help. Do you think it still has any value? I really like the look of the watch and would love to own it but don't want to waste my money on something that is not correct.
     
  5. Javi22 Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    Edited Feb 19, 2016
  6. Dgercp Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    Can you get a movement shot with serial number and caseback shot?
    Case and dial do not jive.
     
  7. calalum Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    1,472
    Likes
    7,719
    I don't understand your comment. The watch is obviously incorrect in a number of ways. It may have some value, but only a modest fraction of what the watch would bring if it was correct. But if you don't want something that is not correct (your words), then is there anything further to discuss?
     
  8. Kingnaffer Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Thanks for the advice. I think I'll probably give it a miss although I will try and get a movement and case back shot and post it next week if I can. Thanks guys.
     
  9. Kingnaffer Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    It's such a shame because to the untrained eye it looks so lovely.
     
  10. Javi22 Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    A movement and case back shot makes this watch not better....::shy:: forget her.
     
  11. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Feb 19, 2016

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,018
    Well it has a value, in these heady
    Indeed....but once your eye becomes trained....oh dear
     
    Bienne2998 likes this.