- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 2
Help identify old Omega?
- Posts
- 13,478
- Likes
- 31,755
X350 XJR
··Vintage Omega AficionadoPerhaps it would be nice if you introduced yourself?
- Posts
- 23,496
- Likes
- 52,230
Dan S
·It looks legit at first glance, but it doesn't give much to go on. More information will be inside.
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 2
- Posts
- 920
- Likes
- 3,833
OneTwo
·Welcome to the forum and there's loads of people with more knowledge than me on these and a new member intro thread goes a long way.
The watch you posted looks like a gold cap example similar to a 165.001 or 165.002, looks off at the bezel though to be a 165.002, but if that's is true the case back looks like it could be a replacement. Or it could be similar to an earlier CK 14720, lugs look a bit thick for that reference, but getting an photo of inside of the case back will definitely help you figure out the reference. Additionally if it is a 165.001 or 165.002, most of the dials fitted with these had "Seamaster" above the 6 o'clock index but that's not an always rule as Omega produced an immense amount of dial variations when these watches were being made.
The watch you posted looks like a gold cap example similar to a 165.001 or 165.002, looks off at the bezel though to be a 165.002, but if that's is true the case back looks like it could be a replacement. Or it could be similar to an earlier CK 14720, lugs look a bit thick for that reference, but getting an photo of inside of the case back will definitely help you figure out the reference. Additionally if it is a 165.001 or 165.002, most of the dials fitted with these had "Seamaster" above the 6 o'clock index but that's not an always rule as Omega produced an immense amount of dial variations when these watches were being made.
- Posts
- 17,631
- Likes
- 36,871
JimInOz
··Melbourne AustraliaHave a read here and get back to us with your findings.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/how-do-i-identify-my-vintage-omega-watch.93146/
You don't have to worry too much about the fake part, your example looks to be genuine.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/how-do-i-identify-my-vintage-omega-watch.93146/
You don't have to worry too much about the fake part, your example looks to be genuine.
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 2
thaines
·Thanks so much everyone for the replies this has been very helpful. Also glad to hear it's probably not a fake.
- Posts
- 4,593
- Likes
- 10,806
janice&fred
·Welcome to the forum and there's loads of people with more knowledge than me on these and a new member intro thread goes a long way.
The watch you posted looks like a gold cap example similar to a 165.001 or 165.002, looks off at the bezel though to be a 165.002, but if that's is true the case back looks like it could be a replacement. Or it could be similar to an earlier CK 14720, lugs look a bit thick for that reference, but getting an photo of inside of the case back will definitely help you figure out the reference. Additionally if it is a 165.001 or 165.002, most of the dials fitted with these had "Seamaster" above the 6 o'clock index but that's not an always rule as Omega produced an immense amount of dial variations when these watches were being made.
It's plated. not capped. The rest of your gobbledegook I won't even bother with.
- Posts
- 23,496
- Likes
- 52,230
Dan S
·It may seem like a bargain, but the gold-plated case and moldy dial make this an entry-level piece in relatively poor condition. And considering that you may have to invest another few hundred dollars towards a movement service, it may not be money well-spent. If you take some time scanning the private sales forum on this site, you may start to develop a better feel for quality and value.
- Posts
- 920
- Likes
- 3,833
OneTwo
·As I mentioned:
Excuse the mis-phrasing of "plated". It was only my intention to be welcoming to the new member seeking advice, as we've all been there.
And LOL didn't mean to offend by providing a few reference numbers and thoughts for the OP to start a search.
there's loads of people with more knowledge than me on these and a new member intro thread goes a long way.
It's plated. not capped. The rest of your gobbledegook I won't even bother with.
Edited:
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 2
thaines
·It may seem like a bargain, but the gold-plated case and moldy dial make this an entry-level piece in relatively poor condition. And considering that you may have to invest another few hundred dollars towards a movement service, it may not be money well-spent. If you take some time scanning the private sales forum on this site, you may start to develop a better feel for quality and value.
Even for like 100 bucks?
- Posts
- 23,496
- Likes
- 52,230
Dan S
·That probably about what it's worth, but it's a questionable buy IMO, for the reasons I mentioned. It's a cheaper watch at the best of times, the dial isn't attractive, and there may well be water damage. Personally I would put the $100 towards something better, but if you want to pick up something cheap to try it out, it's obviously not a big risk.
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 2
- Posts
- 23,496
- Likes
- 52,230
- Posts
- 606
- Likes
- 785
Franco
·According to your location, a good service will cost far more than the initial cost, in this case perhaps twice or three times. Plus parts.
A watch in better conditions - will have a similar total cost. Service may not require as many replacement parts, and at the end you have a more pleasant and mechanically better watch.
A watch in better conditions - will have a similar total cost. Service may not require as many replacement parts, and at the end you have a more pleasant and mechanically better watch.
