Help a newbie out! Advice needed Speedmaster Mark ll

Posts
9
Likes
0
Hi guys!

Total newbie here and I’m considering to buy this Speedmaster with a racing dial, from my inexperienced eyes, I am only uncertain about a few details:

- The caseback is sterile, it should have a speedmaster logo?

- The lume on the dial and hands (as seen in the pictures are strong), does that indicate a redial and new hands instead of the original vintage parts?

- The dial says “Swiss made” at the bottom, instead of “T Swiss Made T”?

- How do I find the watch’s individual serial number?

- Is there a way to date this watch (seller says it’s from the 1970’s but does not have more specific info)?

Hopefully those more knowledgeable than me (which is probably all of you!) will be able to chime in if this is a good and honest example of a Mark ll with regards to it having all the correct parts and also is there anything else I should ask about the watch?

If you were to buy this, what would be a ballpark figure to look for, price wise?

Last photo showing the white arrow, which is pointing to a chip in the crystal.




Thank you all so much and appreciate any input you guys might have!
Edited:
 
Posts
576
Likes
2,157
I’m not qualified to comment on the watch’s authenticity but I will say that it is very attractive. Experts here will probably point out whether it is 100% or not, but nonetheless it’s a beauty IMO. I hope it is real for your sake!
 
Posts
9
Likes
0
Yes I really hope it is authentic too! But with vintage watches I really don’t know how to tell, especially since all the different parts could have been changed out and replaced.
Even the end links of the bracelet so I’m hoping someone with more experience can weigh in on the watch.
 
Posts
521
Likes
410
looks refinished. see the waviness of the brushing on the bracelet, doesn't look like OEM omega to me.

not to say it's not a nice watch... what's the price? what do you want? a solid timepiece or an all original safe queen?
 
Posts
879
Likes
962
The dial is a service dial, also the minute and hour hand. Crown looks like a replacement, can‘t really tell from the pics. The case seems to be refurbished but not done well in my opinion, lapidation is too deep. My conclusion: it depends on the price snd if you are happy with that watch. The serial is inside, the caseback is dead polished. For a correct date of production you can get an Extract of the archive from Omega( not for free)

This is mine with the same service parts but different bracelet (1159/154)

https://omegaforums.net/threads/back-from-spa-145-014.114819/

kind regards Max


Here
 
Posts
879
Likes
962
The lapidation is the sunburst grinding around the crystal. If any of the other forum members has a better explanation I would be happy since English is not my mother tounge.

kind regards Max
 
Posts
453
Likes
679
"Lapidation" means "pretty made".

You can recognize the new dial by the fact that the older models always contain "T Swiss Made T".

The picture is borrowed:



I noticed the following, but I would like to be instructed otherwise 😀

If the T is not in line with the 28 Minute and 32 minute markings but inside, then they are from 1969 to early 1970.

If the "T" is in line with the above markings or outside, then they were built until the mid 70s.

But the definitely important information is on the movement as well as on the inside of the caseback, as already mentioned above.

Greetings

Wuza
 
Posts
4,833
Likes
31,659
Yes, service dial and min/hr hands look to be service as well.

Probably better to buy one without service parts. I have done enough project watches, it is much more difficult to find original parts these days.
 
Posts
698
Likes
2,572
My 2 cents are

It's pretty
The case back has been polished, it should have sea monster.
Probable service dial and hands (originals would of faded alot)
Possible case lapping (puts the grain back) I would ask for a photo of the lugs from the end looking at the shoulders to see how much polishing has been done.

Depending in price I'd keep looking
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,809
the hands, tach scale and bracelet are not original to the watch. Need better dial pics
 
Posts
7,055
Likes
13,163
As an owner of a MKII since 1972 I'll make a few comments. The head and bracelet have been worked on, a bit too much in my opinion. It's not totally unattractive, but not original looking. The polished edge is not natural indicating the case has been worked. The hippocampus on my watch is pretty faint after all these years and it has never been polished. Wearing it for many years will smooth it out. If the crystal is not all scratched up it is a replacement, these were mineral crystals and were easily scratched in use. Not a killer as it will be hard to find a 50 yo MKII with really good original crystal. The bracelet is not original.

This watch isn't the worst I've seen, it depends on how much you value total originality which can be overblown in many instances. Also depends on the price. I'd probably pass and keep looking.
 
Posts
9
Likes
0
Thanks for all the help so far everyone!

The seller wants about USD$2870 for it.

Would you pay that amount?
 
Posts
453
Likes
679
Thanks for all the help so far everyone!

The seller wants about USD$2870 for it.

Would you pay that amount?

Never !

Be patient and learn as much as possible here in the omega forum 😉
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,809
Thanks for all the help so far everyone!

The seller wants about USD$2870 for it.

Would you pay that amount?

not a chance
 
Posts
7,055
Likes
13,163
Thanks for all the help so far everyone!

The seller wants about USD$2870 for it.

Would you pay that amount?
Hell, no.
 
Posts
4,833
Likes
31,659
Too much. One in original condition with papers sold on eBay for $2450 earlier today.