Careful here, as there is yet some additional fine print on most renter's/homeowner's policies. With most companies you have two options for insurance: 1) a blanket (unspecified) jewelry/watches limit 2)or as a specific scheduled piece, requiring appraisal and serial numbers, etc.
In the latter case, the trouble is usually justified by lower rates. In the former case, simply having blanket coverage is not enough, as you must also specifically purchase a rider for"off-premises" loss. Without this specific rider, losses that did not occur in the covered "premises" aren't subject to coverage.
But this is a long side topic... even with homeowner's/renter's coverage, you'll want to insure the shipment if it's a high value item. As I certainly wouldn't want to risk bumping the rates of much more expensive coverage due to shipping loss or damage.
Finally, it's certainly worth considering the probabilistic nature of all insurance. If you invert the situation as Charlie Munger urges, the probabilities of shipping loss or damage are generally quite low in relation to the high premium that is charged for the insurance. So for lower value items--for which I would not be financially devastated with a loss--it often pays to write your own premiums. That is, self insure. Forgo insurance altogether.
Click to expand...