Forums Latest Members
  1. Drawarms May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    Was wondering everyones thoughts on it, I wonder why it hasnt sold...

    I got more pictures from the seller...thinking about pulling the trigger.

    image5.JPG image4.JPG image3.JPG image1.JPG
     
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! May 7, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    Did you do a site search?
     
  3. Drawarms May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    yes sir, nothing in the past month.
     
  4. efauser I ♥ karma!!! May 7, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    Any other photos of the dial? the right foot of the Omega symbol looks different from the left.
     
  5. Drawarms May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    s-l1600-68.jpg
     
  6. efauser I ♥ karma!!! May 7, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
  7. Drawarms May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    i got nothing else :(
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 7, 2017

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    Rman, efauser and Dgercp like this.
  9. Dgercp May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    I thnk the dial is suspect. The minute markers seem too short. The Omega symbol is not symmetric as mentioned.
    The middle line on the E in OMEGA should be closer to the top line. The horizontal line in the G should be longer and a bit lower down. Plus those numerals look repainted. The center black area in the 9 should be more oval. But, I'm no expert!

    These are all pointed out in Gatorcpa's post.
     
    Edited May 7, 2017
  10. Tony C. Ωf Jury member May 7, 2017

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,226
    Neither the dial (at least in terms of finish) nor hands are original. The bright white numerals would not be possible on an original dial, and the hands lack any apparent oxidation.

    I would not be at all comfortable with the watch at any price.
     
  11. micampe May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,626
    Likes
    6,171
    2996 case back with a cal 267 is also suspect.
     
  12. Deafboy His Holiness Puer Surdus May 7, 2017

    Posts
    2,185
    Likes
    6,149
    Omega symbol looks squat and thick-lined compared to this one
    P1020461.jpg .
     
    R3D9 likes this.
  13. redpcar May 7, 2017

    Posts
    3,699
    Likes
    7,911
    The hour hand looks off to me, too. A little too narrow?
     
  14. michael22 May 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,790
    Likes
    1,897
    The digits of "12" are not perfectly aligned.
     
  15. 63TR4 May 7, 2017

    Posts
    119
    Likes
    195
    I believe this is one I looked at recently too, and the seller had it listed as a redial. Assuming this is the same one I saw, then that would explain the differences between this one and the original dials posted
     
  16. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia May 7, 2017

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Ends of the 3 and 9 flare out to much. Redial I think.
     
  17. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? May 7, 2017

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    On the whole the watch lacks patina. Nice watch, but it would appear to have undergone a strong spa treatment.