Sharp
·Hi there,
I could not find a recent thread focused on this topic but EOA validity is getting regular mentions in other threads so is surely of some interest to members.
I am very curious if anyone has been able to validate if Omega have archive information for Speedmaster dials / Ultraman hands / any model I suppose? Or if they have been cooking it up based on serial ranges/user submitted images during the old extract request process.
I am sure we have members who have interacted with the museum directly, penned some of the best books on vintage Omega, and are much more informed than myself, but in 2024 from what I can see on the forum this still a bit of a mystery?
I don’t really want to deep dive individual examples but feel one should be included for context:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/speedmaster-rare-dial.161888/
This extract for a-63 has the sort of dial information I am curious about. As noted by other members the choice of wording is unusual, and it theoretically validates this dial despite it having very green/short indexes colour one would usually associate with a late 60s/70s production date.
(Thanks for sharing it in full publicly William 👍)
I noticed this old thread with an interesting comment from member Mailollo:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/ext...otype-at-monaco-legend-auctions.120484/page-8
-----
MaiLollo said:
"To be honest, I learned everything I needed to know about EOA last year, when I requested an extract for a racing 69 Speedy. They asked for pictures as they told me the archives don't mention dial information. My extract was issued with the "correct" racing dial mention.
At first I was glad since I knew the watch was kosher (bought from the first owner), but then I realized that EOAs are only useful to determine if a movement was born in x or y reference, but worthless when it comes to authenticating dials & other special features.”
-----
This seems pretty ominous but I would be happy to hear of any information on the contrary, other members experiences, do people think or know for sure if these extracts are valid/fantasy?
Cheers,
I could not find a recent thread focused on this topic but EOA validity is getting regular mentions in other threads so is surely of some interest to members.
I am very curious if anyone has been able to validate if Omega have archive information for Speedmaster dials / Ultraman hands / any model I suppose? Or if they have been cooking it up based on serial ranges/user submitted images during the old extract request process.
I am sure we have members who have interacted with the museum directly, penned some of the best books on vintage Omega, and are much more informed than myself, but in 2024 from what I can see on the forum this still a bit of a mystery?
I don’t really want to deep dive individual examples but feel one should be included for context:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/speedmaster-rare-dial.161888/
This extract for a-63 has the sort of dial information I am curious about. As noted by other members the choice of wording is unusual, and it theoretically validates this dial despite it having very green/short indexes colour one would usually associate with a late 60s/70s production date.
(Thanks for sharing it in full publicly William 👍)
I noticed this old thread with an interesting comment from member Mailollo:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/ext...otype-at-monaco-legend-auctions.120484/page-8
-----
MaiLollo said:
"To be honest, I learned everything I needed to know about EOA last year, when I requested an extract for a racing 69 Speedy. They asked for pictures as they told me the archives don't mention dial information. My extract was issued with the "correct" racing dial mention.
At first I was glad since I knew the watch was kosher (bought from the first owner), but then I realized that EOAs are only useful to determine if a movement was born in x or y reference, but worthless when it comes to authenticating dials & other special features.”
-----
This seems pretty ominous but I would be happy to hear of any information on the contrary, other members experiences, do people think or know for sure if these extracts are valid/fantasy?
Cheers,
