Forums Latest Members
  1. jfwoodman Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    954
    Any obvious concerns with this one? Dial and hands look original?
    GMT.jpg
    Thanks!
     
    George.A likes this.
  2. Toishome Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    2,005
    Likes
    9,545
    Not sure about concerns but it's pretty sexy :thumbsup:
     
  3. WatchVaultNYC Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    3,719
    Likes
    4,190
    Oh nice
     
  4. ATWG Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    2,055
    Likes
    6,192
    Seen this for sale for a while. I don't like the look of the plots, something just doesn't feel right.

    Proceed with caution.
     
    watchknut likes this.
  5. jfwoodman Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    954
    Lume plots are my #1 concern. Seller can't confirm for certain whether original lume, but assumes it to be, and states there is faint remaining glow (appreciate his honesty). Most re-lumes don't seem to have this "aged" look, and plots and hands match nicely, but hard to be sure.
     
  6. jfwoodman Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    954
    Watch comes with second bezel, and this image makes me question the lume a bit more. No chance to view it in person. Any other thoughts?
    upload_2017-7-19_19-30-2.png
     
  7. ATWG Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    2,055
    Likes
    6,192
    Just because they looked aged doesn't mean that it hasn't been relumed as it can easily be painted.
     
  8. wkimmd Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    959
    I saw this watch previously as well; I had a short communication with the seller (and I thought the communication itself was fine; seller was generous with photos, as well). Never seen a 16750 with this kind of lume-aging before; some of the close up photos - thought some of the lume plots looked a little more uneven than it should have.
    The glow I don't think is a problem. Tritium has a half-life of just over 12 years; so some of the 80s watches might hold a glow that you can see. If it charges with a light - that is not the tritium in the lume that is "charging"; it is other parts of the lume "mix" that is probably reacting to the light and appearing "charged."
    I thought price was a bit on the high side for the overall condition though. Initially listed at $9k; now $8.9k.
     
  9. wkimmd Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    959
    Additionally, I think the seller does have a lot of good feedback on TRF.
     
  10. Drawarms Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    a little too globbed on and puffy for me

    hands lume material seem to match dial - puffy and rough''

    I would pass
     
    Edited Jul 19, 2017
    wkimmd likes this.
  11. jfwoodman Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    954
    Thanks all. Driving myself a little nuts scouring the web for comparisons - so your input is much appreciated.
     
  12. sensui Jul 19, 2017

    Posts
    248
    Likes
    629
    Lume plots looks very suspect...looks very much like a relume. Not a bad looking watch though.... good looking insert and case looks decent.
     
  13. Overgrower Jul 20, 2017

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    198
    I would pass. The lume plots don't look right for a 16750. As others said, it's too puffy.
     
  14. leefowler Jul 21, 2017

    Posts
    160
    Likes
    710
    I also think it is relumed and my aged 16750 says hi!

    [​IMG]
     
    sensui likes this.