Formula for determining watch size

Posts
312
Likes
130
While this is a personal preference, there is a certain visual aesthetic that is related to wrist size. Some people have used circumference of the wrist, but I think diameter is a better value to use. My wrist is small, but also muscular so using circumference is kind of artificially inflated.

So using a caliper or a ruler, my wrist diameter is about 57mm. You then multiply that by 0.62 and 0.68 for the min and max of the range and for me I get 55.34- 38.76mm. This checks out as I generally prefer watches that are 35-38mm, and going above this it appears too large and below too small. I cannot remember where I saw this formula, but it was years ago.

I do have some vintage watches that are about 33mm, but with a large dial and slim bezel they appear larger. My largest watch is 39mm. Actually I do have an Invicta that is over 40mm, but I never wear it because it looks rediculously large, though when I bought it years ago my wrist was actually larger and more muscular.

https://theslenderwrist.com/watch-size-guide/

Using this calculator, if I input my wrist circumference size of 7 in., it gives a maximum case diameter of 44mm, which is WAYYYY too big!
 
Posts
7,678
Likes
14,202
All watches wear differently depending on bezel thickness, dial color, watch thickness, along with diameter. There are 44 mm watches that would look ok on your 7" wrist. You need to try a watch on to see how it fits.
 
Posts
2,702
Likes
3,599
If the lugs hang over the side of your wrist, it’s too big.

If you can’t read the dial, it too small.

Anything in between is perfect.
 
Posts
312
Likes
130
I think people have taken this too seriously. As I said some watches will wear larger or small than their measured size, and this is a very general guide. Not to mention how much personal preference will steer a decision. I thought it fascinating that the minimum and maximum of what I considered wearable for my wrist coincided with the results of this formula. I thought this was really cool.
 
Posts
5,071
Likes
15,650
Actually its mostly psychological, and dependent on what one is used to…which is dependent on what one most recently wore…so it changes all the time. If one spends two weeks wearing say a 45mm watch…then puts on a 36mm watch…it feels ‘small’ initially. Until the brain gets used to it. And vice versa. Truth is, both are great at least on my wrist size and i have realized this psychology a while ago so its not a limitation and there is no formula. Naturally that all scales with wrist size…some folk can wear 33mm watches up to 42mm…

If it starts looking like a dinner plate on the wrist…then maybe its a bit big…but if one is ok with it, then thats all that matters.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,615
Likes
3,859
I think diameter is a better value to use

(...)

I do have some vintage watches that are about 33mm, but with a large dial and slim bezel they appear larger.

😁

So maybe the diameter is misleading... Also on which season/time of the week is yor wrist precisely 57mm?

For example I do have a 44mm diameter Seiko SLA21 diver, on paper it should be unwearable. It actually looks smaller than a 41mm Omega sm300, I tried.

Both your watch and your wrist are 3d objects, a simple metric like a diameter may or may not work to assess an aesthetic. You should try watches with an open mind; also small or big watches can take some time to visually get used to.