Forums Latest Members

Followup on one of my watches, an Omega '61 Pocketwatch, with more pictures...

  1. RocketBoySweden Nov 6, 2013

    Posts
    14
    Likes
    3
    Have some more pictures from the last owner that perhaps might teach me a thing or two...
    Saw that a seller on this forum said his watch had a cal. 565, and i saw that on the innards on his photos... Does that mean my pocketwatch has a cal. 161 from this photo? If so, i might be learning some already. :D

    175085334_375d0242-c431-42c3-b3e0-b9d4b08ea3b7.jpg 175085334_a17fd78a-a2af-4d1e-9c04-09d74da5e646.jpg

    Might there also be a way to see what kind of model the actual watch is? I've tried to search the serial/production number through Omega's official database, but to no avail. :/
     
  2. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 6, 2013

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,722
    I think I found something on the Database:

    http://www.omegawatches.com/spirit/history/vintage-omegas/vintage-watches-database?ref=14823

    Dial is similar, as are the hands.

    It could be that these were made as late as 1961 (my birth year) with slight changes to the movement and dial. I don't think Omega sold a lot of pocketwatches after WWII.

    You'd need to get an extract of the archives from Omega to know the whole story:

    http://www.omegawatches.com/spirit/history/extract-of-the-archives/order-form

    Hope this helps,
    gatorcpa

    Edit - I was able to find some information through Google. There were a number of national railroads that used these watches up through the 1960's...with the updated caliber number of 161.

    Typical example:

    http://micmicmor.blogspot.com/2007/06/omega-china-railway-pocket-watch.html
     
  3. ulackfocus Nov 6, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974

    Wow, you're old!!!

    :D
     
  4. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 6, 2013

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,722
    Fooled you, didn't I? :p
    gatorcpa
     
  5. Patrick Dixon How do these messages get here? Nov 8, 2013

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    113
    1961 is young ...

    That watch looks NOS.