Forums Latest Members
  1. NJDK Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    4
    I inherited my grandfather's Seamaster which he used on a daily basis as skipper on his fishing boat back in the 1950s. After having it serviced, i ordered an extract from the archives.
    I had already been looking up on the numbers, and was certain it was from 1952 due to the 13.XXX.XXX-intervals, but on the extract it says "Production: June 20, 1955". Am I misunderstanding something or is this a mistake?
    Is it to be understood as the actual production date and how do you think this correlates with the movement number being 13.922.984. It's a CK 2577 (C-2577-6 SC) with the 354-calibre.
    Also, do anyone know when Omega stopped production of the Bumper-movement?

    Thank you
    Niclas, Denmark
     
    IMG_8416.JPG
    Tonyash, chronoboy64 and Passover like this.
  2. Passover Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    1,854
    Likes
    2,528
    Hi Niclas,
    sorry I can't answer your questions but I want to thank you for sharing the history of your watch and the collage with the photograph.
    The patina on the dial adds a lot of character to the watch and makes me think of storms, wind, waves and sunshine reflected by the sea... :)
    Nice post!
     
  3. Jantar Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    212
    Likes
    879
    I have a waffle dial that starts with 13.62 that I'd always thought was from '52.
     
  4. NJDK Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    4
    Thank you, it sure adds some to the history that it spent much of it's life on the North Sea with him. I was told he specifically went for an automatic so that it could hang in the wheelhouse during deck work, rewinding itself thanks to the waves of the sea.
     
  5. Gav1967 Tend not to fret too much Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    1,399
    Likes
    2,973
    Hi there,

    I am no expert but was lead to believe the 1952 date would be when the movement was made however movements were often made and kept in stock until required. the EftA date of 1955 would be when the watch itself was assembled and sent out.

    Hope this is broadly correct and assists
     
    Togri v. 2.0 likes this.
  6. ConElPueblo Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    The square logo points to a post-1952 date to me, so I am not completely surprised. Still a late date for a 13.X movement!
     
    Gav1967 likes this.
  7. NJDK Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    4
    That's a sound theory, I guess it's hard to ascertain what the procedure was back then. It just seems like a long time, from production in 1952 to assembly in 1955. But who knows
     
    Gav1967 likes this.
  8. ext1 Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    1,134
    Likes
    1,673
    It might also be a typo, there was a typo in someone's speedmaster extract in another thread. But I'm more leaning towards the date being the sale/delivery date. It's always confusing which kind of date they are giving you in the extract..
     
  9. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 15, 2019

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    There might be 2-3 years between the production of the movement and the time the watch is actually delivered to a distributor.

    For some US made watches, I've seen watches sold in the 1940's that have movements made in the 1920's.
    gatorcpa
     
    Verdi, NJDK and Gav1967 like this.