Looks like a 2848, its had some polishing but not terrible. The seamaster on that dial is not what I'm used to seeing. I've only seen one other with that looping S and tail on the r but that's not to say it's wrong. The hands, dial and markers look correct as does the crown. I wouldn't pay more than 500 for it and that would depend on when it was last serviced. If it needs a service you may have to spend another few hundred on it. Probably uses a 501 movement which is a real work horse.
Is this reference a front loader as I don't see anything on the case back that would allow a tool to catch?
Is this reference a front loader as I don't see anything on the case back that would allow a tool to catch?
Is this reference a front loader as I don't see anything on the case back that would allow a tool to catch?
I think it’s a 2767 with probably a 354 bumper movement. It’s not a 2848 since that’s the sub-second case reference. It could be a 2846, but the case back style looks more similar to a 2767 than a 2846.
It looks nice to me. The dial is pretty nice and the case looks sharp. I’m not a fan of presentation case backs, but if you don’t mind, then it seems like a good deal.
I think it’s a 2767 with probably a 354 bumper movement. It’s not a 2848 since that’s the sub-second case reference. It could be a 2846, but the case back style looks more similar to a 2767 than a 2846.
It looks nice to me. The dial is pretty nice and the case looks sharp. I’m not a fan of presentation case backs, but if you don’t mind, then it seems like a good deal.
I didn't think the bezel was big enough to be a 2767 but you may be right and the photos just make it look a bit thinner. Could also be a 2577 at this rate.
I agree. I'll see how it runs for a day or two then see if Al will give it a work over when he's done with my 2254
