Explorer 214270 vs Black Bay 58...other suggestions

stevec14

I would add something like a black dial explorer 2 (16570). You already have a diver so a gmt would be good.

otherwise for a chrono, what about a speedy? A little bigger but would be a nice change up (and is a strap monster to boot)

jud

I own quite a few of the references you are considering or that have been recommended I would go with the 214270 because of the versatility it affords a small collection. While I like the thought of a Speedy, I think with two Omegas it would be nice to diversify your collection.

BB58 -- I really like the look of this watch but am disappointed by the execution. Specifically there is no half link for the bracelet and only three notches of adjustment in the clasp. I personally believe this is to differentiate Tudor from Rolex and their bracelet/clasp combination. I even tried adding the easylink from my Explorer to see if that would work, but the screws are different widths. I have had the BB58 less than 3 weeks but am considering selling it already because the bracelet does not fit me well.

Explorer 214270 -- I think this is the most versatile watch in my collection. It can be dressed up or down, looks good with jeans or a suit. I like the 39mm size but some think the 36mm older versions are better proportioned. This is a great under the radar Rolex. I tell my wife that I enjoy having a Rolex that most people think is a Timex.

Explorer 16570 white or black -- I sold the black one but owned them both for a couple of years, have kept the Polar. I like the look of the black on other people's wrist, but I rarely wore it. The white one rarely get worn but fits in my collection well. If you want something around 40mm that is different this is a great option. It wears smaller than the newer Rolex models in 40mm but that is a good thing.



.

rkman11

Given what you plan on keeping, I’d vote the explorer. And I commend you on the 3 watch move - thinking about that more and more myself!

jud

I own quite a few of the references you are considering or that have been recommended I would go with the 214270 because of the versatility it affords a small collection. While I like the thought of a Speedy, I think with two Omegas it would be nice to diversify your collection.

BB58 -- I really like the look of this watch but am disappointed by the execution. Specifically there is no half link for the bracelet and only three notches of adjustment in the clasp. I personally believe this is to differentiate Tudor from Rolex and their bracelet/clasp combination. I even tried adding the easylink from my Explorer to see if that would work, but the screws are different widths. I have had the BB58 less than 3 weeks but am considering selling it already because the bracelet does not fit me well.

Explorer 214270 -- I think this is the most versatile watch in my collection. It can be dressed up or down, looks good with jeans or a suit. I like the 39mm size but some think the 36mm older versions are better proportioned. This is a great under the radar Rolex. I tell my wife that I enjoy having a Rolex that most people think is a Timex.

Explorer 16570 white or black -- I sold the black one but owned them both for a couple of years, have kept the Polar. I like the look of the black on other people's wrist, but I rarely wore it. The white one rarely get worn but fits in my collection well. If you want something around 40mm that is different this is a great option. It wears smaller than the newer Rolex models in 40mm but that is a good thing.



.

onthedial

@MikeJF
I'm going to switch things up on you...I recommend choosing your favorite between the Seamaster 300M Ti and Seamaster 1948, and selling the least favored. I would then buy an Explorer 21427 (or 114270 if you prefer) and a white or silver dial Datejust. If you're going for a three-watch collection you need a classy and timeless dress watch and the Datejust is iconic.
-- My 2 cents.