You're both missing the broader point, and misunderstanding my position. I am not interested in proving that your particular watch is not original in every way. I am, however, interested in learning more about what appears to be a very real, and broader mystery. At this stage of the discussion, the questions that I am posing that relate to your watch are a part of a larger attempt to unravel that broader mystery.
It's fine that you, and other collectors have accepted that these poor, to extraordinarily poor engravings were original to the watches. But even if I accept that premise, I am interested in why Rolex might have chosen such inferior, outdated methods, and exercised such poor quality control.
I will also add that if Rolex collectors such as yourself are so willing to readily accept such poor quality as being original, it is an open invitation for unscrupulous sellers to re-engrave cases, no matter how poorly, without any fear of being discovered. And that creates a real problem for the market, and a minefield for collectors, in my view.
Click to expand...