Early 1960s Constellations x2

Posts
140
Likes
114
Hello all, my first Omegas arrived today and I'd like your opinion please.
I set out to find an early 1950s Constellation but have gravitated towards the 1960s 5xx models. I don't really know what I'm talking about yet so please forgive any clangers!
They are both steel - a 1961 14393 with lyre lugs (thanks to @dsio and the fantastic Ebay recommendations thread) and a 1962 14900 with dogleg lugs (that was a bit of a punt).
I took them to a watchmaker where I live in Bristol today (Horological Underground) for an initial assessment, to get the backs opened and see what was inside and to book a service. Case back and movement pics thanks to them. I've been struggling to take pics in the night-time kitchen lighting on my phone so any tips would be welcome - probably take them in the day time!
The 14393 first - it's the original crystal, would you have it polished or replaced? Not the original crown, would you replace with an original? Not the original strap or buckle, would you search for an Omega buckle? My initial thought is polish the crystal, don't replace the crown, nice new strap, non Omega buckle and wear it 😀
 
Posts
34,267
Likes
38,885
I’d probably replace the crystal and leave the crown, and not bother with an Omega buckle but instead buy one of those shell cordovan straps that are really supple and nice. I have one from this bloke that is quite good but other people make them too. Don’t have the watch itself polished as it has nice sharp edges still just get it cleaned thoroughly.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/watchstrapheaven-big-summer-blowout.117063/page-2#post-2036512
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
Now the 14900 - it's not the original crystal, would you search for a nos Omega replacement? Not the original crown, would you replace with an original? Not the original strap but could be the original buckle, or I presume it's Omega. Can anyone please confirm?
I'm also really pleased with this purchase. It came with the original box in really good condition and the certificate matching the serial number noting it had "exceptionally good results". The seller's photos were really bad, but like I said in my original post I have a better understanding of how difficult it is to take good ones! The lugs look really sharp but it's difficult to capture in the pics.
My initial thought is replace the crystal with nos signed, replace the crown with the thin decagon, transfer the buckle to a new strap. As I've got the box and cert, I thought to get this closer to factory specification and keep it for special 😀
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
I’d probably replace the crystal and leave the crown, and not bother with an Omega buckle but instead buy one of those shell cordovan straps that are really supple and nice. I have one from this bloke that is quite good but other people make them too. Don’t have the watch itself polished as it has nice sharp edges still just get it cleaned thoroughly.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/watchstrapheaven-big-summer-blowout.117063/page-2#post-2036512
Perfect advice, thank you! And thanks again for the recommendation .. that thread is great viewing 🥰
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
3,354
Hello all, my first Omegas arrived today and I'd like your opinion please.
I set out to find an early 1950s Constellation but have gravitated towards the 1960s 5xx models. I don't really know what I'm talking about yet so please forgive any clangers!
They are both steel - a 1961 14393 with lyre lugs (thanks to @dsio and the fantastic Ebay recommendations thread) and a 1962 14900 with dogleg lugs (that was a bit of a punt).
I took them to a watchmaker where I live in Bristol today (Horological Underground) for an initial assessment, to get the backs opened and see what was inside and to book a service. Case back and movement pics thanks to them. I've been struggling to take pics in the night-time kitchen lighting on my phone so any tips would be welcome - probably take them in the day time!
The 14393 first - it's the original crystal, would you have it polished or replaced? Not the original crown, would you replace with an original? Not the original strap or buckle, would you search for an Omega buckle? My initial thought is polish the crystal, don't replace the crown, nice new strap, non Omega buckle and wear it 😀
Great start to your collection!
Take pictures in daylight. It's perfectly possible to take decent pictures with an iphone depending on the generation. Close ups in focus is the test.


If you want the watch to be desirable to collectors, DO NOT HAVE THEM POLISHED.

DO try to find the right crown. Interesting that @dsio disagrees with me here.

DEFINITELY have the crystal polished if it's original. If you're not satisfied with how it turns out have it replaced. It's not a big deal but I think always nicer if the original crystal is still there, but not if it's knackered. Those pictures would suggest the crystal will polish up OK. If it has any cracks change it.

Strap and buckle is a matter of personal choice. I think most collectors would say that an original buckle is a nice to have, with or without an Omega strap. Where a watch might have originally been sold with a bracelet many will look to pair the head up with a bracelet, but again, it's not crucial. Many people prefer to use a particular type or brand of strap that they find comfortable.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Those dogleg edges are really sharp! 👍

On vintage Omega watches the originality of parts add value to the watch so I would tend to look for original crystal and crown. In the case of the 14900 the crown is already original so leave as is. The crystal is quite banged up so probably worth changing instead of refurbishing.
 
Posts
3,402
Likes
13,196
Nice catches! The dogleg case seems to be pretty sharp, too - more often than not they’ve lost their awesome shape.

Personally, I wouldn’t worry too much about a non-original plexi, but ask your watchmaker. If he can source one, why not.


In the case of the 14900 the crown is already original so leave as is.

I politely disagree - a thin decagonal would be correct. Again, a matter of personal taste but especially with the doglegs the right crown makes a difference to me, as it mirrors the edgy case style. Doesn’t have to be a flat foot logo one (which would set you back ~100$ or so), but service replacements / repros (same shape) can be found on eBay regularly for 20$ or so. Imo that’s worth it.
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
@Engee Thank you! The watchmaker thought the 14393 crystal would polish up ok. Does that mean you lose the logo? Yeah pleased one came with an Omega buckle. I don’t think I’ll be able to resist searching for another one 😀
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
@Deafboy @MtV thank you yes the dogleg facets look really good to me in the flesh. Hard to capture in the pics. The watchmaker said he thought it was unpolished but did hmmm afterwards and say maybe a little. He also said the movement was in excellent condition which was great to hear.
I guess the damage on the lugs is from changing the strap? I wouldn’t have the case polished but would you have localised repairs of nicks like that?
My research so far agrees with @MtV that it should be a decagon crown.
 
Posts
3,402
Likes
13,196
Never mind a little nick on the case. It’s 60 years old - let it have a scar here and there. 😀
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
Never mind a little nick on the case. It’s 60 years old - let it have a scar here and there. 😀
Even better 😀
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
3,354
@Engee Thank you! The watchmaker thought the 14393 crystal would polish up ok. Does that mean you lose the logo? Yeah pleased one came with an Omega buckle. I don’t think I’ll be able to resist searching for another one 😀
Not sure if the logo is etched onto the inside or outside of the crystal - I think the outside so you may lose it, depending on how it’s polished up. For sure, keeping the Omega symbol on the crystal is the reason to preserve it, for me at least. Crystals are not expensive, so you’re weighing the cost of the watchmaker or their assistant spending time polishing an original against paying for a replacement.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Logo is inside the crystal so no problem when polishing.
 
Posts
34,267
Likes
38,885
DO try to find the right crown. Interesting that @dsio disagrees with me here.
Yea the crowns I’m a bit of a pragmatist about, I have several Connie’s with original dodecagonal crowns and I hate them because they’re terrible to use, I have lots of Seamasters with clover crowns too and they’re about as bad, so I like my watches with grippy knurled crowns and when I get a crown like that on a watch that didn’t originally come with it… I just use it because spending more money to make thing harder on myself isn’t my idea of a good time. I’m a minority in caring less about crowns as long as theres a practical option on it, most people would agree with you on that. I tend to avoid the Omega buckles just because of how many fakes there are and use the ones that come with the straps I buy too out of convenience.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Connie’s with original duodecagonal crowns and I hate them because they’re terrible to use,

So true. Although pretty, those things are so difficult to grab.
 
Posts
316
Likes
287
Well done, nice watches.

My personal approach to scratched crystals is to have a good whack at them myself with Polywatch. Mostly that works just fine; if it doesn’t (because the scratches are so deep) I get them replaced.
 
Posts
140
Likes
114
Took a few pics in daylight today. Gone for it a bit - got new crowns, a more period buckle and a bracelet. Didn't mean to buy the bracelet, just kind of happened.