Does patina really add value to watch? Omega pre-Seamaster 2451-6 Cal 321

Posts
236
Likes
281
Hi OF. Been more on the lookout for vintage watches lately and instead of restoring an older Cal 321, I was recently offered this one by my local watchmaker with original dial. Sorry my pics isn't the greatest, but hopefully it captures the essence of this Ref. 2451-6 with a serviced Cal. 321. He says he's giving me a great deal because of the beautiful patina on this original dial. It's an attention getter. So how much does patina actually add to value on vintage Omegas?

 
Posts
7,538
Likes
34,608
The big problem with the watch is that the dial is (water) damaged and missing much of the minutes and tachymeter tracks. That will significantly devalue the watch so any talk of increase value due to the patina is misplaced with this one.
 
Posts
11,993
Likes
20,838
Nine times out of ten, patina has a neutral or negative impact on value.
Agree it’s certainly not a plus on this one.
 
Posts
1,997
Likes
1,227
That would have been a refinishing project.

what great deal is he asking for it?
 
Posts
8,071
Likes
58,005
He's asking a straight $4k for it.


Yikes, but baby needs new shoes!

Not patina, DAMAGE, rusted upper pusher shaft, too....water damage
 
Posts
773
Likes
6,687
That's damage, not patina. I wouldn't spend $4k for something in that condition.
 
Posts
2,732
Likes
12,293
This watch looks like it smoked for about 50 years.
 
Posts
21,679
Likes
49,162
In this case, I would say that although the patina has some appeal, overall the condition of the dial detracts from the value because of the non-uniform coloration, badly faded printing, etc. It's the type of watch I'd consider at a bargain price, and then just enjoy it as a curiosity. I think that $4k could probably buy a very good example of this reference. So I can't imagine he will get even $3k for it, and $2k-$2.5k is probably more realistic. The dial is really rough.