bigbug1964
·Thanks for taking the time to put this together. By the way, four of the five known WWW Promethium dial variants can already be seen earlier in this thread.
One point caught my attention, though. You mention that Enicar lost the WWW contract because it supplied shell or bomb timers to Germany. Do you happen to have a contemporary document or other reliable source supporting that claim? I’d genuinely be interested, as I’ve never come across documentary evidence for it.
I’d also be interested in your thoughts on the Longines WWW shown below. Its case back appears to show an original WWW marking, later cancelled, followed by an ATP marking that was also cancelled, before receiving a second WWW marking. The watch also retains matching lug numbers.
How would you interpret a watch like this within the post-war history of the WWW programme?
Would you regard it as an example of the evolution from ATP to WWW, followed by continued military service and later re-marking, or do you see a different explanation?
bb64
One point caught my attention, though. You mention that Enicar lost the WWW contract because it supplied shell or bomb timers to Germany. Do you happen to have a contemporary document or other reliable source supporting that claim? I’d genuinely be interested, as I’ve never come across documentary evidence for it.
I’d also be interested in your thoughts on the Longines WWW shown below. Its case back appears to show an original WWW marking, later cancelled, followed by an ATP marking that was also cancelled, before receiving a second WWW marking. The watch also retains matching lug numbers.
How would you interpret a watch like this within the post-war history of the WWW programme?
Would you regard it as an example of the evolution from ATP to WWW, followed by continued military service and later re-marking, or do you see a different explanation?
bb64
Edited:


