Dirty Dozen Omega - Any saw combat? Vintage Omega Watches

Posts
64
Likes
188
Thanks for taking the time to put this together. By the way, four of the five known WWW Promethium dial variants can already be seen earlier in this thread.

One point caught my attention, though. You mention that Enicar lost the WWW contract because it supplied shell or bomb timers to Germany. Do you happen to have a contemporary document or other reliable source supporting that claim? I’d genuinely be interested, as I’ve never come across documentary evidence for it.

I’d also be interested in your thoughts on the Longines WWW shown below. Its case back appears to show an original WWW marking, later cancelled, followed by an ATP marking that was also cancelled, before receiving a second WWW marking. The watch also retains matching lug numbers.

How would you interpret a watch like this within the post-war history of the WWW programme?

Would you regard it as an example of the evolution from ATP to WWW, followed by continued military service and later re-marking, or do you see a different explanation?



bb64
Edited:
 
Posts
21
Likes
21
Thanks for taking the time to put this together. By the way, four of the five known WWW Promethium dial variants can already be seen earlier in this thread.

One point caught my attention, though. You mention that Enicar lost the WWW contract because it supplied shell or bomb timers to Germany. Do you happen to have a contemporary document or other reliable source supporting that claim? I’d genuinely be interested, as I’ve never come across documentary evidence for it.

I’d also be interested in your thoughts on the Longines WWW shown below. It clearly began life as a British WWW, but later received additional military markings during subsequent service.

How would you interpret a watch like this within the post-war history of the WWW programme?

Would you regard it simply as an example of the continued post-war service life of the WWW, with subsequent re-issue and re-marking, or do you see a different explanation?



bb64
Thanks for taking the time to put this together. By the way, four of the five known WWW Promethium dial variants can already be seen earlier in this thread.

One point caught my attention, though. You mention that Enicar lost the WWW contract because it supplied shell or bomb timers to Germany. Do you happen to have a contemporary document or other reliable source supporting that claim? I’d genuinely be interested, as I’ve never come across documentary evidence for it.

I’d also be interested in your thoughts on the Longines WWW shown below. It clearly began life as a British WWW, but later received additional military markings during subsequent service.

How would you interpret a watch like this within the post-war history of the WWW programme?

Would you regard it simply as an example of the continued post-war service life of the WWW, with subsequent re-issue and re-marking, or do you see a different explanation?



bb64
Hello bb46, the info on the Enicar is in Konrad Knirim's book, I am in Hospital at the moment so can't tell you which page, will look later today.

I have seen WWW's downgraded to the lower ATP standard (possibly due to loss of its waterproofing) but never upgraded back to WWW.

There are examples of ATP's with WWW markings, but the consensus is that these are either fake or engraved by mistake (on a Friday before rushing to the pub perhaps!)
 
Posts
322
Likes
753
Hello @bb46, the info on the Enicar is in Konrad Knirim's book, ....
and @bigbug1964...
This information on a WWW Enicar in my book comes from investigations of Thomas König, whose article from him and Adrian v.d. Meijden I was thankfully allowed to take:
"This situation, combined with the fact that for Enicar, a stores number for a ‚Watch, Wristlet, Waterproof‘ had been allocated, may be a consequence of Allied investigations on Swiss supplies to the Axis. The Allies had investigated which Swiss watch producers were involved in the production of fuses for Germany. Probably at the same time the procurement procedure for the W.W.W. was started. As a result those Swiss manufacturers could be discharged or be placed on a black list."
Greetings Konrad Knirim
 
Posts
64
Likes
188
Hello bb46, the info on the Enicar is in Konrad Knirim's book, I am in Hospital at the moment so can't tell you which page, will look later today.

I have seen WWW's downgraded to the lower ATP standard (possibly due to loss of its waterproofing) but never upgraded back to WWW.

There are examples of ATP's with WWW markings, but the consensus is that these are either fake or engraved by mistake (on a Friday before rushing to the pub perhaps!)
Hello bb46, the info on the Enicar is in Konrad Knirim's book, I am in Hospital at the moment so can't tell you which page, will look later today.

I have seen WWW's downgraded to the lower ATP standard (possibly due to loss of its waterproofing) but never upgraded back to WWW.

There are examples of ATP's with WWW markings, but the consensus is that these are either fake or engraved by mistake (on a Friday before rushing to the pub perhaps!)
Hello Geo,

First of all, I’m sorry to hear that you are in hospital. Please don’t trouble yourself with this today—I hope you recover quickly.

Your explanation regarding the downgrade from WWW to ATP is particularly interesting. What makes this Longines unusual is precisely the apparent sequence WWW → ATP → WWW, with both earlier markings cancelled while the lug numbers still match. I’d be very interested to hear how you would explain that.

I also had to smile at your comment about ATPs with WWW markings being either fakes or the result of someone engraving them on a Friday afternoon before rushing to the pub.

Perhaps the white-dial WWWs were created in the same pub later that evening… 😉

Best regards,
Guido
 
Posts
64
Likes
188
and @bigbug1964...
This information on a WWW Enicar in my book comes from investigations of Thomas König, whose article from him and Adrian v.d. Meijden I was thankfully allowed to take:
"This situation, combined with the fact that for Enicar, a stores number for a ‚Watch, Wristlet, Waterproof‘ had been allocated, may be a consequence of Allied investigations on Swiss supplies to the Axis. The Allies had investigated which Swiss watch producers were involved in the production of fuses for Germany. Probably at the same time the procurement procedure for the W.W.W. was started. As a result those Swiss manufacturers could be discharged or be placed on a black list."
Greetings Konrad Knirim
Hello Konrad,

Many thanks for your prompt reply and for clarifying the source.

I actually have the article by Thomas König and Adrian van der Meijden, and I know Thomas personally. I’ll ask him what the hypothesis is based on, and whether there is any contemporary documentary evidence supporting it.

I noticed that the wording in the original article is quite appropriately cautious (“may be”, “probably”), which is rather different from how the story is sometimes repeated as an established historical fact.

Many thanks again for taking the time to look it up.

Best regards,
Guido
 
Posts
322
Likes
753
See here some oddly marked or dialed WWW or ATPs ....
Edited:
 
Posts
64
Likes
188
See here some oddly marked or dialed WWWs...
As for the white-dial WWW collector lore that has circulated for years, I think the first two examples actually make the opposite point.

They are ATP watches by construction, not WWW watches built to the original specification.

A later “WWW” engraving may be historically interesting, but it cannot be taken as evidence that original white-dial WWWs ever existed.

Simply engraving “WWW” on the case back does not magically transform an ATP into a Watch, Wristlet, Waterproof.

A case-back engraving can be changed. The construction of the watch cannot.
 
Posts
21
Likes
21
As for the white-dial WWW collector lore that has circulated for years, I think the first two examples actually make the opposite point.

They are ATP watches by construction, not WWW watches built to the original specification.

A later “WWW” engraving may be historically interesting, but it cannot be taken as evidence that original white-dial WWWs ever existed.

Simply engraving “WWW” on the case back does not magically transform an ATP into a Watch, Wristlet, Waterproof.

A case-back engraving can be changed. The construction of the watch cannot.
Indeed the term WWW refers to a certain specification put out by the military which would have covered all aspects of the watch, ligne size, case construction, crown, dial, hands, waterproofing, shock proofing (which was not required funnily enough)

ATP watches were taken up from civilian trade and just had different dials hands with numerals and lume. You cannot upgrade one of these to a WWW specification.

BUT, as stated previousy if the WWW loses any of its 'capabilities' it can be downgraded to an ATP.
 
Posts
21
Likes
21
Thank you. Yep that makes sense. My own watches with tritium all date from at least 1966. I had never heard of promethium before this. Did commercial brands like Omega use them?
When I was in the Army, for my sins I was placed in the SQMS Stores (Squadron Quartermaster Sergeant) on a tour of Bosnia with NATO. All of our watches (and luminous minefield defile markers) were kept in a locked cabinet with the 'Radioactive' symbol on the door. Not lead lined or anything just a normal cabinet!

in the 2000's Tritium was deemed just about as unsafe as radium, so now any British Mil watches.. (and not many are issued anymore) have (L) Luminova markings..such as this Pilots watch.

 
Posts
64
Likes
188
When I was in the Army, for my sins I was placed in the SQMS Stores (Squadron Quartermaster Sergeant) on a tour of Bosnia with NATO. All of our watches (and luminous minefield defile markers) were kept in a locked cabinet with the 'Radioactive' symbol on the door. Not lead lined or anything just a normal cabinet!

in the 2000's Tritium was deemed just about as unsafe as radium, so now any British Mil watches.. (and not many are issued anymore) have (L) Luminova markings..such as this Pilots watch.

 
Posts
64
Likes
188
Hi everyone,

For anyone interested, I have prepared clean reconstructed transcriptions of all three pages of the British Ministry of Supply Specification R.S./Prov./4373A for the W.W.W. (Watch, Wristlet, Waterproof) watches.

These are not original archival scans, but carefully reconstructed transcriptions based on the document photographs that have circulated within the collecting community for many years. Their sole purpose is to make this important historical document easier to read and use for research.

To avoid any confusion with original archival material, each page is clearly marked as a reconstructed transcription.

Please feel free to download and use them for private, non-commercial research and reference.

If you use or share them elsewhere, I would appreciate a small credit:
Reconstructed transcription - © 2026 - Guido Hamacher

Should any copyright holder, archive or forum administrator consider these reconstructions inappropriate, I will of course respect that decision and remove them.

I hope they are useful.

Best regards,
bb64