- Posts
- 7
- Likes
- 0
Holden Caulfield
·
I I have two non-working watches (only one of them pictured) ...what to do next?
A while back I acquired off of ebay (at what seemed like a good price) a Seasmaster Cosmic Ref 136022 Cal 613 with a black dial (no numbers, just sliver markers and crosshairs), a date feature at 3 o'clock, with an Omega buckle, and double signed by Turler. I've been casually interested in vintage watches for a few years but this was my first (and only) purchase. Clearly I hadn't done my homework as the seller swore it was in tip top working order (it didn't run much past the time when I made my paypal payment). However, I still think that the watch is pretty cool and have thought about getting it refurbished. A bit of research led me to a local expert but he suggested that the lack of a back and some internal water damage made it difficult for him to do serious work on it. I then sent it to Omega in New York and they have quoted me the following: $710 for a complete overhaul and $250 to have the face touched up for the minor water damage. Needless to say this is a few times what I paid for the watch.
My dilemna is this...I like the watch but the servicing is a good chunk of change and I don't want to sink good money after bad. Is it worth refurbishing and should I have them touch up the face (I have read from many of these threads that its a big negative for collectors)? I would include some pictures but alas its at Omega and the ebay pictures from when I bough it are no longer up. I'm okay with putting some money into it if down the road I'll be able to sell it and get atleast most of it back.
One other variable...when my Dad found out that I was into vintage watches...he told me that he had an old broken watch lying in his top dresser drawer. Turned out to be a Triple Date Moonphase which is missing the crown. The face looks to be in pretty great shape and I've attached a photo (don't laugh at the Twist o Flex band...apparently that's how my grandfather liked it). I have not opened up the back to look inside so I don't know what condition its in. My casual reserach suggests that this is a far more interesting watch...should I just cut my losses with the Seamaster and put my money towards fixing this one up? I'm guessing that the extra complications make it that much more expensive to service? Am I wrong? It's a very impressive timepiece...but I don't think i'd feel comfortable wearing it on a daily basis (as I would with the Seamaster). I bought the Seamaster becasue I need a watch to wear...and it seemed like something that would be good for everyday (assuming I can get it to run).
Thanks for the advice (and reading my saga)...by the way, I've really enjoyed reading through these threads. They've been very helpful.
A while back I acquired off of ebay (at what seemed like a good price) a Seasmaster Cosmic Ref 136022 Cal 613 with a black dial (no numbers, just sliver markers and crosshairs), a date feature at 3 o'clock, with an Omega buckle, and double signed by Turler. I've been casually interested in vintage watches for a few years but this was my first (and only) purchase. Clearly I hadn't done my homework as the seller swore it was in tip top working order (it didn't run much past the time when I made my paypal payment). However, I still think that the watch is pretty cool and have thought about getting it refurbished. A bit of research led me to a local expert but he suggested that the lack of a back and some internal water damage made it difficult for him to do serious work on it. I then sent it to Omega in New York and they have quoted me the following: $710 for a complete overhaul and $250 to have the face touched up for the minor water damage. Needless to say this is a few times what I paid for the watch.
My dilemna is this...I like the watch but the servicing is a good chunk of change and I don't want to sink good money after bad. Is it worth refurbishing and should I have them touch up the face (I have read from many of these threads that its a big negative for collectors)? I would include some pictures but alas its at Omega and the ebay pictures from when I bough it are no longer up. I'm okay with putting some money into it if down the road I'll be able to sell it and get atleast most of it back.
One other variable...when my Dad found out that I was into vintage watches...he told me that he had an old broken watch lying in his top dresser drawer. Turned out to be a Triple Date Moonphase which is missing the crown. The face looks to be in pretty great shape and I've attached a photo (don't laugh at the Twist o Flex band...apparently that's how my grandfather liked it). I have not opened up the back to look inside so I don't know what condition its in. My casual reserach suggests that this is a far more interesting watch...should I just cut my losses with the Seamaster and put my money towards fixing this one up? I'm guessing that the extra complications make it that much more expensive to service? Am I wrong? It's a very impressive timepiece...but I don't think i'd feel comfortable wearing it on a daily basis (as I would with the Seamaster). I bought the Seamaster becasue I need a watch to wear...and it seemed like something that would be good for everyday (assuming I can get it to run).
Thanks for the advice (and reading my saga)...by the way, I've really enjoyed reading through these threads. They've been very helpful.