Constellation Dial and ID Help

Posts
10
Likes
2
Hi all,

I want to buy this seemingly unique Constellation but before i do i would like to have your opinion on this one if possible.

The case comes in gold/steel, the caliber 551 movement of the watch has a 17.00…serial but i have a hard time to match the no date movement and dial with the 168.005 reference number on the inside of the caseback as this is date reference.

I read that it is common to find wrong casebacks on these watches but someone also told me that this could be a rare transitional piece…

Also i have never seen this kind of dial configuration with this movement and case, for me this dial looks older than the 1959-1960 movement and case.

What do you think about this piece?
Should i be suspicious? If yes why?



Thanks so much!
 
Posts
6,830
Likes
10,500
It is a well known ‘rail track’ dial.
The reference is 14381 with an incorrect caseback.
 
Posts
53
Likes
45
It is a well known ‘rail track’ dial.
The reference is 14381 with an incorrect caseback.
Agree with the above: the watch is a 14381 with a caseback from a later model.


Why the caseback can’t be original:

  • The 551 is the no-date chronometer movement; the 561 is its calendar version (Omega parts catalogue GF 620). The Omega Vintage Database lists the 1959 Constellation with the 551 as 14381. PlainVanilla’s database here on the forum lists the gold-cap version as KO 14381, which matches your case.
  • The same database lists 168.005 as the 1962 Calendar reference, for the 561/564. So a 551 with a 17.0 million serial wouldn’t have been cased in it.
  • A 1962 date caseback on a 1959 no-date watch is a swap, not a transitional piece. Transitional watches mix parts from the same period, not a back from a different model and a later reference system.

On the dial, the “rail track” layout was used on these 1959 Constellations, so it doesn’t on its own point to an older dial.


Before you buy:


  • Price it as a 14381 with a replacement back. A correct 14381 back is worth hunting for later.
  • If originality matters to you, an Omega Extract of the Archives on the movement serial will confirm the reference and delivery date. If it were mine, I would look for a correct case for the watch.
Edited:
 
Posts
10
Likes
2
Agree with the above: the watch is a 14381 with a caseback from a later model.


Why the caseback can’t be original:


  • 168.005 is the Constellation Calendar reference from 1962, made for the cal. 561/564 date movements, in gold-cap and steel versions. The 551 is the no-date chronometer, so a 551 with a 17.0 million serial was never cased in a 168.005.
  • The no-date 551 Constellations of 1959 are the 14381 family. The gold-cap on steel version is KO 14381, which matches your case.
  • A 1962 date caseback on a 1959 no-date watch is a swap, not a transitional piece. Transitional watches mix parts from the same period, not a back from a different model and a later reference system.

On the dial, the “rail track” layout was used on these 1959 Constellations, so it doesn’t on its own point to an older dial.


Before you buy:


  • Price it as a 14381 with a replacement back. A correct 14381 back is worth hunting for later.
  • If originality matters to you, an Omega Extract of the Archives on the movement serial will confirm the reference and delivery date. If it were mine, I would look for a correct case for the watch.
That is some great Info!! Thank you so much 👍
 
Posts
8,173
Likes
36,708
Wrong crown too, a scallop crown is generally seen on this ref....and they are neither cheap nor easy to locate.
 
Posts
6,684
Likes
11,652
Also a soft overpolished case with what looks to be a previously chemically cleaned dial. Here is one of mine for reference: