Constellation 168.005 "Pie Pan" counterfeit?

Posts
759
Likes
804
Hi all,

Late last week I purchased my first Constellation with "Pie Pan" dial and just had the opportunity to pick up the package from my post office. At first look, the watch looked to me to be relatively original, but in overly polished condition. At under $700 it seemed to be a relative bargain. After looking through some of the threads in this forum and reviewing Desmond's writeup, I started to notice a few red flags and became worried that the case may be a counterfeit.

I had purchased this watch from a local auction house that specializes in horology and they mentioned that it had an original case and an "expertly refinished dial". To me, the dial was not a huge deal breaker because it looked clean and presentable. It also seemed to me that most of the dials on these watches don't survive the test of time all too well. I noticed that the casebook reference number read 167.005, which would be incorrect for this model, but I just assumed that the casebook had been switched at some point.

Before reaching back out to the seller, I'd love to get your thoughts.

- Does the case look correct? It seems to be missing the chamfering on the lug edge, but I had figured it may have been polished out. Also the faceting on the bottom of the lug that Desmond described as beginning "at the point of where the lug is attached to the case" instead seems to begin midway through the case.

- Is it at all common/possible for the lug holes to ever be drilled incorrectly? When removing the band, I did notice that both sets of spring bar holes don't sit directly across from each other. I tried to show this in an attached photo, but one of the holes on each side seems to sit far too close to the edge of the lug and causes the springboard to attach a little crooked.

Any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated. I had never realized that these watches were commonly faked. Please let me know if I should take any more photos. Thank You!

Edited:
 
Posts
13,309
Likes
18,419
Dial is a fake. Case back may be genuine, but for wrong reference as Ref. 167.005 is for a non-calendar cal. 551 movement.

Mid-case may or may not be original, but the issues with lug holes don’t give me the warm and fuzzies.

If you bought on eBay, you may have recourse for a refund.

Really, the time to ask is before you make a purchase.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
8,484
Likes
60,613
Can you return it?


Not expertly repainted for one MAJOR reason. And there are many/alot of excellent dials. And no, Omega was tops, so the holes should be perfect.

Case appears wonky to me with these pix.
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,777
More likely than not the whole thing if a fake, dial for sure and the case doesn't look right either, those stars are way too lumpy.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,810
More likely than not the whole thing if a fake, dial for sure and the case doesn't look right either, those stars are way too lumpy.

What do you think of the lettering on the rotor?
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,810
The movement is genuine.

I thought so too but the lettering on the rotor looks a little uneven. Maybe they're all that way and I'm just looking for something that isn't there. 😁
 
Posts
759
Likes
804
Dial is a fake. Case back may be genuine, but for wrong reference as Ref. 167.005 is for a non-calendar cal. 551 movement.

Mid-case may or may not be original, but the issues with lug holes don’t give me the warm and fuzzies.

If you bought on eBay, you may have recourse for a refund.

Really, the time to ask is before you make a purchase.
gatorcpa

I appreciate the insight and I will definitely do so next time! Any way to differentiate a repainted dial vs a fake dial?
 
Posts
759
Likes
804
Can you return it?


Not expertly repainted for one MAJOR reason. And there are many/alot of excellent dials. And no, Omega was tops, so the holes should be perfect.

Case appears wonky to me with these pix.

Fortunately, I can still return it if it isn't as described/represented. This is one of the reasons I was asking/concerned about the originality of the case. Is the "MAJOR" reason MOY alignment?
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,810
Fortunately, I can still return it if it isn't as described/represented. This is one of the reasons I was asking/concerned about the originality of the case. Is the "MAJOR" reason MOY alignment?
I would like to know as well. I would have identified that as likely genuine, myself.
 
Posts
759
Likes
804
More likely than not the whole thing if a fake, dial for sure and the case doesn't look right either, those stars are way too lumpy.

Is the dial at least a decent refinish?
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,810
Is the dial at least a decent refinish?

Classic fake: MOY test fails, i in "Constellation" is not dotted, "Constellation" is too big, incorrectly spaced and poorly scripted (note the lack of serif on the "s"), double T dial would indicate a presence of lume, wrong curvature/facets on the date window, black in the middle of indices are likely painted, onyx insert dials usually do not have a printed minute marker on the hour index, hands would likely have a matching onyx insert (to the indices)
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,810
Case appears wonky to me with these pix.

case looks fake. look at the side (outer lugs) of the bezel and the case; there should be one chamfer/facet on each component. OPs bezel/case is smooth. Holes don’t really matter at this point
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
Classic fake dial ( not repainted)

The mid case might be genuine - I’ve just compared it to my SGR dogleg and it’s so very close I wouldn’t like to call it out as a fake - but it is heavily polished.

The case back is another story.
It certainly doesn’t belong to the movement.
The perlaging looks wrong and the medallion looks wrong too - the observatory in particular - and it actually looks applied rather than integral.
I would suggest this is a fake case back.

At the very least a mess of a frankenwatch - return it if you can.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,810
Classic fake dial ( not repainted)

The mid case might be genuine - I’ve just compared it to my SGR dogleg and it’s so very close I wouldn’t like to call it out as a fake - but it is heavily polished.

You might be right - it may be polished beyond recognition but I feel like I’ve seen similar fakes. Either way, as you say, the watch has too many issues to keep just for the movement
 
Posts
1,117
Likes
1,791
onyx insert dials usually do not have a printed minute marker on the hour index,
They do it’s just that on some dials the indicies cover the mark.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,810
They do it’s just that on some dials the indicies cover the mark.

just looked - you’re right. Thanks
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
OPs watch is 167.005, for a no date caliber 551.

By the way, not sure why you think that's the wrong case number?

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-constellation-calendar-cd-168-0005

Certainly the wrong crown....

Hope it’s ok to post that here, it helped me a lot and might not be known to everybody: So the first 3 digits of the ref give you information about the watch. Here’s the chart:


In this example (168):
1: Gent’s watch, check.
6: Self-winding center second, check.
7: (water resistant) Chronometer, no calendar: fail. That’s what X350 refers to, the watch has a date, so it has to be an 8 here.