Comparing fat font bezels and thin on a 1675 and a 16750

Posts
2,520
Likes
17,819
Yeah, yeah, I’m a little bit of a bezel freak. To me, I’m amazed at how many nice watches I see that are spoiled by their bezels.

A couple of years ago, I picked up a really nice 16750 from 1986 and, a few months later, a 1675 from 1972. Both had thin font bezels. Yuck.

It’s taken me awhile, but I finally put fat font bezels on both of them — yes, a red backed bezel for the 1675 and a blue one for the 16750. I think the new bezels make both watches.

Here’s one before and two after shots.

What do you guys think?
 
Posts
581
Likes
3,654
Correct me if I’m wrong but the fat font bezel is not correct for a 16750 right? I do love the way it looks though. The bezel on my 83 is a thin and a red back.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,808
looks correct - later 16750 would have blue back (font sizes may differ)
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,808
it’s very tricky....for plexi/acrylic early 1675 could have a super fat font or fat font smooth (non-stepped), red-back insert, early 16750 could have a fat font (not sometimes not as "fat," non-stepped) red-back insert, later 16750, 1675X would be smaller font(non-stepped) font blue back.
It’s Rolex so no hard and fast rules because I have seen super fat and fat font inserts later than the "rules" would indicate.
16700 starts with a different design
 
Posts
21,090
Likes
48,142
Who else thinks that @killer67 knows way too much about watches to be posting without an avatar? 😁
 
Posts
2,162
Likes
6,712
Very interesting, I love listening to insert experts, plenty around specially on TRF. I’ll keep thoughts to myself.

Inserts do in fact make the watch. I love the insert on the 1675 , quite lovely pair.
 
Posts
20
Likes
15
Nice bezels, but what does it for me is the matte dial on the 1675. I wish Rolex never would've changed from the matte dials on the GMTs.
 
Posts
86
Likes
107
Fat font bezel inserts look great on a 1675. Here’s my unpolished Mk2 with a mega fat font. I think that’s the latest ref that a mega ff would be period correct.
Edited:
 
Posts
203
Likes
106
They are both very nice watches ( I especially like the 16750: it looks unpolished with a very nice patina) and I like the new inserts.

I am afraid the one on the 16750 (the new fat font I mean) is a later service insert: in fact a couple of years ago Rolex released a batch of service fat font insert that looked this way.

Indeed it looks good on your watch, but I believe the slim font in the first picture is the correct one.
 
Posts
603
Likes
2,566
Fat font bezel inserts look great on a 1675. Here’s my unpolished Mk2 with a mega fat font. I think that’s the latest ref that a mega ff would be period correct.

The MFFs are from the mid/late sixties to early seventies. Not originally seen on the chapter ring gilt dials, though a lot have migrated onto them because people like how they look. While the Mark 2s are seen with them, the early batch Mark 4’s with the 3.0-3.3m serials have been seen with them too, so that’s the last iteration that they’re considered period correct on.
 
Posts
2,162
Likes
6,712
Fat font bezel inserts look great on a 1675. Here’s my unpolished Mk2 with a mega fat font. I think that’s the latest ref that a mega ff would be period correct.
I have a near twin insert, also on my MK II
 
Posts
2,520
Likes
17,819
Very interesting, I love listening to insert experts, plenty around specially on TRF. I’ll keep thoughts to myself.

That’s a shame. Even if I don’t agree with you, I’d be interested to hear your more experienced (than me) view.

The new 16750 bezel is blue backed and came from a reputable Swiss parts dealer. I think it’s right on my watch, but I admit that how nice it looks may prejudice me.

 
Posts
581
Likes
3,654
The new 16750 bezel is blue backed and came from a reputable Swiss parts dealer. I think it’s right on my watch, but I admit that how nice it looks may prejudice me.


Mmmm.. this IS a tasty bezel
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,988
What do you guys think?

Sexier than the bezels is the fact you have both watches set to the exact same time (including GMT) to within 2 secs. Scratches my OCD itch.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,808
Fat font bezel inserts look great on a 1675. Here’s my unpolished Mk2 with a mega fat font. I think that’s the latest ref that a mega ff would be period correct.

That’s THE mega faded font on a great MK 2
Edited:
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,808
I am afraid the one on the 16750 (the new fat font I mean) is a later service insert: in fact a couple of years ago Rolex released a batch of service fat font insert that looked this way.

Indeed it looks good on your watch, but I believe the slim font in the first picture is the correct one.

@Chris75 how can you tell that is a service insert from that batch? Is there a tell tale sign?
 
Posts
86
Likes
107
That’s THE mega faded font on a great MK 2
Thank you. I’m getting a spare mega ff that has a very even fade to compliment my current insert. Happy to have found this example with a great dial and rare unpolished case for the age. These are very comfortable pieces for regular wear.
Edited: