WatchVaultNYC
·When I look at your collection, my first thought is - sell the 2 non BT SM300s and play around with a couple of watches that isn't a Sub, a GMT Master or an SM300.
When I look at your collection, my first thought is - sell the 2 non BT SM300s and play around with a couple of watches that isn't a Sub, a GMT Master or an SM300.
I didn't sell hardly anything for the first 8 years or so but it reached a point of just having way too many watches, I think at one point I had 85 or something, way too many for me.
There followed a long slow cull over a period of 2 years or so to bring the numbers down to a manageable level. This thinning now gets repeated every year or two and can be brought about by too many, or too expensive, new arrivals.
This is what consolidation can get you.
I decided that instead of having several Speedmasters, I'd just have this Speedmaster;
Instead of having several Seamster 300's, I'd just have this Seamster 300;
Instead of having several Rolex divers, I'd just have these 2 Rolex Divers;
any watches that I sell will be offered on here first...preferably never make it to the board😀
This is what consolidation can get you.
I decided that instead of having several Speedmasters, I'd just have this Speedmaster;
Instead of having several Seamster 300's, I'd just have this Seamster 300;
Instead of having several Rolex divers, I'd just have these 2 Rolex Divers;
Could be a cyclical thing? I just went through a phase where I bought around additional 20 pieces in a span of around a month - just to see what I was missing out on. Most of them are headed to the chopping block but a few pieces added to my permanent collection.
As for a "world class collection" I'm afraid that if I ever wanted to measure my watches in those terms, I'd end up with a collection that was bought for someone else's enjoyment. Like for example, I would feel miserable if I gave up my comparatively dirt cheap Black Bay Red (which I wear regularly) with some other watch 10x more valuable but I would never wear. In a similar vein, my box has an Ed White, but yet I wear a 3592.50 more often. Should I just sell Eddie? Maybe I just need a better Ed White specimen?
As to buying the best pieces becoming "dangerous", I'm still trying to find a rule of thumb that makes economic sense. Say watches as a fixed percentage of your net worth? There is some opportunity cost when you keep a significant portion of your assets in watches. They could be earning money for you in business or investments.
Most of us would realize (knowingly or unknowingly) that our vintage watches have appreciated over the years. For example, I bought my minty Omega Speedmaster 321 a few years back for $1,500.00 complete with the correct bracelet. Now you can't buy the same watch for less than $7k. So if we follow WatchVaultNYC's suggestion of keeping a portion of our asset in vintage watches, it could be a nice retirement fund later on.
Most of us would realize (knowingly or unknowingly) that our vintage watches have appreciated over the years. For example, I bought my minty Omega Speedmaster 321 a few years back for $1,500.00 complete with the correct bracelet. Now you can't buy the same watch for less than $7k. So if we follow WatchVaultNYC's suggestion of keeping a portion of our asset in vintage watches, it could be a nice retirement fund later on.
Not too long ago my wife was getting on me about my habit...you all know the song and dance. Instead of the typical tune, I changed course and let her know that if our 16 month old daughter were 18 today, that the black Pelican case could fully fund 4 years of an in state college...a little more. When I said imagine the value in 15+ years, she had a different outlook.
What is crazy is that she still doesn't get it...buying crazy expensive investment grade pieces is a totally foreign concept to her.