CK2292 aka. "Spitfire-Watch"

Posts
108
Likes
43
Hey guys,

I'd need some help with this one here.

To me it looks all good, except for the crown of course.

Only thing I'm a bit worried about is the writing on the caseback. Only have seen one before, where the writting was a bit smaller...and not so shaky.

Any help would be appreciated.

Cheers
 
Posts
1,356
Likes
712
It's a Royal Air Force or Air Ministry. Do you have the extract of archives?

I like it. Enjoy it 馃憤
 
Posts
108
Likes
43
That is not a spitfire watch.

This is

Thx for the info...i thought it was one too...as it can be found under this synonym.

Cheers
 
Posts
108
Likes
43
It's a Royal Air Force or Air Ministry. Do you have the extract of archives?

I like it. Enjoy it 馃憤

No i dont have it...its not even mine yet. Thx tho.

I knew that it was made for the RAF...thanks for the info...i'm not sure if the caseback is 100% genuine
 
Posts
2,266
Likes
4,263
No i dont have it...its not even mine yet. Thx tho.

I knew that it was made for the RAF...thanks for the info...i'm not sure if the caseback is 100% genuine

He麓s answering to my post.....
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,701
Thx for posting. I can鈥檛 help with your question, but I have never seen 16!jewels before, so that was interesting. Thx
 
Posts
108
Likes
43
Thx for posting. I can鈥檛 help with your question, but I have never seen 16!jewels before, so that was interesting. Thx

I think its because of the central seconds
 
Posts
1,015
Likes
3,979
It's copasetic, save for the crown. Mov't correct, caseback for 2292 ref. with Pheon is correct.
 
Posts
768
Likes
1,328
The case back looks OK to me. There are plenty of examples online to compare. It isn't a pilots watch, a navigators maybe. The lugs are delicate on the 2292 case and are often shortened after one breaking so take care with them if you buy/bought it.
 
Posts
499
Likes
743
Looks good to me including the engraving on the case back. As has already been said, the crown is a later replacement.