Dial- I agree looks good, with some degradation of the lacquer layer causing some of the texture irregularities on first photo. Better preserved than most of these. Many but not all of these have CALENDAR beneath the Seamaster script. Crosshair is nice. Indices have onyx markers, also nice. The script is very clean and very "serifed" but looks good to me.
Hands are correct dauphine style in very good condition. Non luminous.
Crystal is original Omega most likely original to ths watch- can clearly see the older Omega flat foot logo on the magnified photos. The white spots on the first and fourth photos are on the crystal- probably dust- the crystal will be fine with cleaning and any scratches will buff out with Polywatch so I would not worry about that.
Thank you @SOG53 and @hoipolloi for the feedbacks! I'm owing this watch is a 2849-15sc to be precise, probably the immages are misleading do to the compression of the depth of the marco shot, actually the minutes hands is matching the seconds mark on the dial not going beyond.
I had the doubt regarding the hands as in some research I've found kind of a "flat hands" and in other cases the domed one, but never the faceted style.
(I've attached the two example I compared to as reference)
Having the wrong hands, could it be realistic to get the correct ones? Sorry but I'm kind of new of the vintage omega world
I’m seriously impressed with the quality of photos the OP was able to post, rarely do people go to that length.
I’d just stick with those hands as @Larry S suggested, it’s close enough and the watch looks quite aesthetically appealing overall, im sure it looks great on the wrist.