Can you spot the $106,200 difference?

Posts
6,596
Likes
21,331
Cuz I can't. Both archetypical of 1970's styling; both automatic; one slimmer than the other, but could also be less rugged; both on integral bracelets. Jumbo Patek: $110,000. Mint Omega 125, $3800. Go figure...

 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
There's a clear difference...one says Patek Philippe and the other Omega
 
Posts
1,294
Likes
2,290
There's a clear difference...one says Patek Philippe and the other Omega

i have no dog in the fight. .and i think 100k is a big # for the patek. . but you are comparing one of the all time great watch designs by one of the all time greatest watch designers (genta) to something that is just a cluttered mess.

and again..i own several speedmasters and currently own zero PP watches

fwiw. . i see the 3700s all the time on the wrists of mega contemporary artists and dealers (the billionaire class). there is something about the aesthetic that has made it a classic. ..rightly or wrongly
 
Posts
6,749
Likes
12,737
Omega is no Patek Philippe, recognize that fact and move on.
 
Posts
763
Likes
1,338
Is the Patek made of platinum? The precious metal could be the difference...
 
Posts
1,294
Likes
2,290
Is the Patek made of platinum? The precious metal could be the difference...

um. no. no it isn't.
 
Posts
6,596
Likes
21,331
There's a clear difference...one says Patek Philippe and the other Omega

Yes, I got that. But $100,000 difference?
 
Posts
6,596
Likes
21,331
Omega is no Patek Philippe, recognize that fact and move on.

Have them both, and the Patek is way over-valued here, and the Omega, undervalued. And yeah, I think I'll stick around...
 
Posts
1,294
Likes
2,290
Yes, I got that. But $100,000 difference?

why
Have them both, and the Patek is way over-valued here, and the Omega, undervalued. And yeah, I think I'll stick around...

the ome
Yes, I got that. But $100,000 difference?

since the patek has gone straight up pretty much continuously in the last decade and the speedmaster price hasn't (and likely won't ever) change. . you could have posted the same thing when the gap was 10k, 20k, 30k, etc. why not 100k ? you could post the same idea in the art world and the difference is millions not thousands.

this isn't that complicated. . the price difference reflects supply and demand of each watch

moving on. . .
 
Posts
9,501
Likes
14,985
Easy, there is no real comparison. The 125 is a boat anchor on the wrist and the ginger step child or black sheep of the Speedmaster family. I am no fan of the 1970s Genta excesses either to be honest but it is an iconic design. It worked so well on the AP RO he used it twice (granted with tweaks) so it must be good. 😉
 
Posts
1,294
Likes
2,290
Easy, there is no real comparison. The 125 is a boat anchor on the wrist and the ginger step child or black sheep of the Speedmaster family. I am no fan of the 1970s Genta excesses either to be honest but it is an iconic design. It worked so well on the AP RO he used it twice (granted with tweaks) so it must be good.

Yep

I mean hold on let me find an image of a Rothko and then the splatter painting my 5 year old made this week .. How on earth can there be a 50 million dollar difference ??? 😉
 
Posts
2,993
Likes
7,853
Have them both, and the Patek is way over-valued here, and the Omega, undervalued. And yeah, I think I'll stick around...

I'll take that Patek off your hands for the price of the 125 😉
 
Posts
251
Likes
287
A Steel Patek Ref.5980 cost in 2010 around 30K.
Today it costs 90K.
This watches (Nautilus) are not more a hobby and enjoyment.
Only investment and unbelievable prices...
 
Posts
6,596
Likes
21,331
this isn't that complicated. . the price difference reflects supply and demand of each watch

That's pretty much stating the obvious. Sometimes price differentials are due to a perceived qualitiative difference, like the workmanship, or sublime details that render an item incredibly desirable. My estimation is that the difference is mostly brand hype, not much more.
 
Posts
648
Likes
4,248
Because it's an Omega 125, instead of 2915 😁
 
Posts
8,120
Likes
19,001
Cuz I can't..

to me the difference in cost between these two watches is a moot point as a watch must first satisfy (me) how it looks (esthetics) and the PP fails (me) in that regard, so (my) attention is grabbed by the 125 .. and thus the Omega becomes (my) preference.

😀
Edited:
 
Posts
6,596
Likes
21,331
I'll take that Patek off your hands for the price of the 125 😉

PM me to make arrangements...