Bizcut1
·Yes. They did. Where have you been?
If it’s a three register Speedmaster chronograph AND it’s qualified by NASA for manned space flight and EVA, then it’s a Moonwatch. Otherwise, it isn’t.
Actually, the website says, "...it has been popularly known as the Moonwatch". Those a wiggle words to my ear.
Actually, the website says, "...it has been popularly known as the Moonwatch". Those a wiggle words to my ear.
D DuckieYep, there's plenty of wiggle room there.
Even Omega themselves are using the word "popular".
Let's take a look at it again.
Only watches with 321 movements have ever been on the moon and a single example with the 861 orbited the moon as part of an experiment conducted by NASA.
I think watches with 1861's are approved for EVAs and have logged more hours in space on EVAs than anything else, so theoretically they could be strapped to the wrists of those who will go to the moon and actually land the next time it happens.
As far as these new 3861 watches go, they're potentially just as capable or even more so as anything that has proceeded them.
So why not label them as "Moon watches"👍
Just as long as they don't have date complications👎
"...it has been
It is a carefully chosen grammar to create ambiguity by the website creator to implicate may or may no longer be the moon watch.
By definition, present perfect tense refers to an action or state that either occurred at an indefinite time in the past or began in the past and continued to the present time.
Anyway, I guess everybody can agree that as of today September 30, 2021, the new 3861 is de facto the "Last Omega in Space" - LOiS.
So we got "FOiS" and "LOiS"?