can anyone confirm please <3

padders

Frankly if you think that is a 1967 piece, you have so little knowledge to proceed that you should stop and do some reading as you are going to be paying way over the odds for an average watch. You are at this stage a mug punter and liable to buy the equivalent of magic beans. I half expect your inbox to be filled with less than scrupulous low life offering you a Speedy Reduced for the price of an Ultraman.

Stripey

This falls into the category of harsh but fair. Common sense alone would say that with a watch described as 1967 by the seller yet with a caseback saying it is the first watch worn on the moon, something is amiss.

Stripey

This falls into the category of harsh but fair. Common sense alone would say that with a watch described as 1967 by the seller yet with a caseback saying it is the first watch worn on the moon, something is amiss.

I don't know if you are focused solely on the Speedmaster Professional, but if you are, Moonwatch Only by Gregoire Rossier and Anthony Marquie is worth thinking about buying. Expensive, but not in the context of the mistake you nearly made.

Edit - the current edition of Moonwatch Only is the 3rd Edition.

airansun

The Squirrel, had he still been around, would have been far more direct, shall we say, with a new member who lacks focus

If you can’t focus, you can’t hit your target.

apsm100

If you have an iPhone get the ebook. Its fantastic and you can learn a ton for a fraction of the price.

melanieux

Ah, ok.
I tried a quick google search, but got a lot of spam looking sites. A little scary.

melanieux

I've used site a lot.
I was looking for the ebook, actually.