Forums Latest Members

Can anyone advise about this Speedy 1967, 321? Archer??

  1. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    Going to check out this watch at weekend, is 1967, 321? would that be Dot above 90? This isn't.
    What do people who know more about this think?
    Its as is, no info, and is non working I've been informed.
    looks bit rough, any value to it as it stands? worth what? easy repair?
    Sorry to ask loads of not easily answerable questions, just trying to see if its worth a punt?
    Photo's to show it...
    Regards,
    Ian 148-3.JPG 148-4.JPG 148-5.JPG
     
  2. repoman Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    2,248
    Likes
    4,274
    From the pics shown, which are really insufficient, yes, its a 1967 Speedmaster Professional, calibre 321. Relatively low serial #. This would come originally with a Dot over 90, and dot-diagonal 70 bezel.

    I think you need to provide more pictures to really say a whole lot more; we would need to see the dial, the sides, etc. From the pics shown, I'd say the movement has a checkered history, notice most of the screws are buggered, and you say its non-functional; so it will need a $600+ service. Others will have more to say about the visual clues from the pics of the movement.

    Yeah, its rough from the pics provided, case looks pretty thrashed from what I can see, and polished to boot (not good) Maybe worth more as a parts watch, I don't know. Make a crazy lowball offer and see what happens, or punt.
     
    Edited Dec 4, 2014
  3. Davidt Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    As Repoman says, we need pics of the front and sides, either good quality pics or a couple of close ups as well.

    It might be a decent user grade/every day 321 or it might be a dog.
     
  4. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    I only have two more pics.
    OMEGA.jpg OMEGA 2.jpg
     
    Edited by a mod Dec 5, 2014
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  5. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    sorry hit twice..!!
     
  6. Davidt Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    Ok. To my mind, the case looks like it's Its had a hard life but it doesn't look overly polished as far as I can see. The dial is the original one. It shows a bit of movement of the lume but I still think it's original.
    Some people say this flat ended Chrono second hand can be original to late 321 models and the lume here seems to match, but personally Id prefer a spear ended one.
    The bezel is a modern replacement, 1990's or newer.

    Depends on the price as to whether its a pass it a buy.
     
  7. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    Ok I'm taking it in..
     
  8. repoman Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    2,248
    Likes
    4,274
    Well, a bit more interesting with the dial shot. I agree with David, dial is original and looks like the best part of this watch, chrono hand being a flat bottom is probably original here (my '67 has a flat bottom chrono). Ditto's on the rest, case is beat up, this watch has had a hard life. Price determines everything here, just go in eyes wide open, there are plenty of better examples out there.
     
  9. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    thought the bezel was not right, for its age.
    going at weekend to look, so I need to get all info I can...
    Thanks for help, keep answering!!
    regards,
    Ian
     
  10. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    yes I have seen better..LOL, depends how much ££££. what would you think in GBP you would give??
     
  11. Davidt Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    Is this in the UK? Prices here are a bit more than in the states.

    Is the movement kippered or just needing a service? We don't know.

    We do know the case isn't great and the bezel is wrong, but the dial looks relatively nice.

    I'd say it's worth around £1700. Maybe a bit more.

    If you want a daily wearer and it can be had for a good price, it looks ok. However, if it will be your only vintage speedmaster, personally I'd wait and pay more for a better one.
     
    Edited Dec 4, 2014
    ICONO likes this.
  12. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    Hi Dave, no I have a couple of others, just not this cal 321 movement, £1700 sound quiet a lot for a watch that's rough, and does not work?
    Regards,
    ian
     
  13. mozambique Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    746
    Likes
    412
  14. Davidt Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    I might be wrong but unless you drop lucky, I'm not sure you can get 321 Speedmasters for much less. What's the asking price?
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  15. Tom Dick and Harry Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    1,527
    Likes
    4,343
    Is this watch at auction in the UK?
     
  16. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    suppose its all down to how much you want one........LOL
     
  17. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    but you also have to factor in the other bits, bracelet, repair, clean etc..
     
  18. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    I feel the need for the Arch Meister to speak...!!
     
  19. jim13x Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    29
    FYI - the caseback in the first group of pictures does not appear to be the same as in the second group of pictures.
     
    m84 likes this.
  20. imexian Dec 4, 2014

    Posts
    246
    Likes
    111
    yes you are correct, seems to be different, two big scratches on first pics??