Calling all Pocket Watch Buffs

Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
That sounded like a request to show off. So here is my 946, it's a later production one made in 1917.

@Waltesefalcon

Forgive me for forgetting your Hamilton grade 946. It seems then that there are two other regular posters who have a 946. So it seems there are three of the grade 946 Hamiltons amongst this group. I don’t have one! 🫨
 
Posts
7,938
Likes
57,337
An outstanding lanyard on an outstanding watch, may I say! I have only ever seen one grade 946, and it was an 18-size, 23-jewel Ball 999 that I serviced for one of the local watch repair fraternity. He’d been trying to locate a balance staff for it, but he didn’t know it was a Hamilton! I told him I HAD staffs for it. The 946 and the related Ball 18-size 999 uses the same balance staff as the Hamilton grades 940, 941, and 944. He had the watch back, repaired, the following day! The 23-jewel, 18-size Ball 999 is ultra rare. There were only 100 of them produced for Ball, and all were made in 1911. I do know that one fortunate participant in this thread also has a grade 946. Please forgive me for forgetting
who it is that owns it!



just wanted to make sure to say mine is a 996
 
Posts
3,803
Likes
36,766
Bought another Omega tonight to add to the collection of Omega.

Dial is far from perfect but might well present well when all cleaned and who knows maybe Omega PW's will be worth something someday!

Seller pics.


 
Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
just wanted to make sure to say mine is a 996


@TexOmega ,

The 996 is a 16-size grade. Your 23-jewel, 18-size Hamilton is grade 946. I am unable to tell from your pictures, but is the movement not marked 946?
 
Posts
7,938
Likes
57,337
The one I show above with the nifty lanyard is a 16s Hamilton grade 996.
 
Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
The one I show above with the nifty lanyard is a 16s Hamilton grade 996.


Aha! You didn’t show the movement, but you did name the grade. I guess I missed that. When @Waltesefalcon followed up showing a 946, I guess I assumed that yours was a 946. Apologies!
 
Posts
7,938
Likes
57,337
Yes, I was reading your subsequent post after my posting and wanted to clarify for all our future pocket watch researchers discovering this thread.


No harm, no foul........1st down after further review👍
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
9,403
Aha! You didn’t show the movement, but you did name the grade. I guess I missed that. When @Waltesefalcon followed up showing a 946, I guess I assumed that yours was a 946. Apologies!

When reading the post in reference to the 18s Ball 999 I just assumed I had missed a post, and took the opportunity to show off my 946.

Which can be found here again.
 
Posts
5,116
Likes
17,783
When reading the post in reference to the 18s Ball 999 I just assumed I had missed a post, and took the opportunity to show off my 946.

Which can be found here again.

🥰 pocketwatch envy
 
Posts
5,963
Likes
43,582
Here's the Hamilton 946 that's here. I've showed the photos before.







The stunningly fabulous movement on the 946 model is difficult to photograph well. I think waltesefalcon's movement photos are better. I also like the way the later 946 movements are marked better than the earlier 946 movements. The information is arranged more stylishly in my opinion. Mine is from 1909 if I recall correctly, without looking it up again.
 
Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
@noelekal has the other 946 that drops in occasionally. I mentioned it in a previous post, but I was unable to remember who owned it.
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
9,403
Here's the Hamilton 946 that's here. I've showed the photos before.







The stunningly fabulous movement on the 946 model is difficult to photograph well. I think waltesefalcon's movement photos are better. I also like the way the later 946 movements are marked better than the earlier 946 movements. The information is arranged more stylishly in my opinion. Mine is from 1909 if I recall correctly, without looking it up again.
They are very hard to photograph half way decently. They are absolutely gorgeous in person, though.
 
Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
We’ve been away, camping, so catch up time in the pocket watch message board. So, today, my 16-size, 21-jewel private label Swiss watch for Porte & Markle Jewellers, Winnipeg, Manitoba. The firm was absorbed by Henry Birks & Sons Jewellers in 1909. So it is a safe bet that this one is about 120 years old. This is the only Electa movement I have ever seen. Associated with Gallet. I marvel at how a watch can exist for 120 years and survive in this condition. Double-sunk vitreous enamel dial, gold filled case by the A W C Co.(American Watch Case Co., Canadian). Hinged front and rear covers and cuvette. First time on my @Duracuir1 leather lanyard. Anyone with preconceived notions about typical plain Swiss movements might be surprised by this one. Bi-metallic, temperature compensating balance wheel, ruby jewels in gold setting held in by polished steel screws, micrometer whiplash regulator, everything beautifully polished, unusual patterned tooling on the bridges.

 
Posts
3,803
Likes
36,766
This just in this morning, can't see how I get the back off, advice needed before I dive in and try springing it off!

Beautiful case condition with little apparent wear at all except of course for the cracked glass ( where could I get one of those? )

What a super slim PW.

As far as I can tell there were only 4,000 of these movements made and of course with this case variant far fewer, once I have the back off I can get the serial.

The back inscription is informative, the company was at that time making Kirby vacuum cleaners but still exists today as a large enterprise.

A $50.00 plus Dollar watch so that's one helluva company Christmas present for 1925!!!

Was sold as not working but sets and runs so I am very pleased.

Daily rate and beat error are shocking but these are a 3 pos + temp and iso so I guess once serviced it should be excellent.

My photos don't do the dial justice, looks much better in the flesh.

Just need a service and new glass.

And how do I get the back off!


Edited:
 
Posts
14,338
Likes
41,310
Should be a “snap” to get the back off. Cases like this are almost always snap backs. The dial appears to have been etched, rather than formed in a die. That cushion crystal will be a challenge to replace.

I Googled the company name.

https://scottfetzer.com/
 
Posts
3,803
Likes
36,766
Should be a “snap” to get the back off. Cases like this are almost always snap backs. The dial appears to have been etched, rather than formed in a die. That cushion crystal will be a challenge to replace.

I Googled the company name.

https://scottfetzer.com/

I discovered this history back to its early days when this was given.

https://case.edu/ech/articles/s/scott-and-fetzer-co

But have had no success yet finding the lucky recipient of this fine piece.
 
Posts
1,446
Likes
5,040
I’ve been on the fence about this one for some time. I don’t really collect PWs but it’s hard to resist the very cool art deco design in an 18k case, and powered by a 37.5 L17R movement if I’m not mistaken.