Calling all Pocket Watch Buffs

Posts
22
Likes
13
Just got this Omega today.Previously owner dind`t know anything about it so i had to open it up.I belive its a Omega cal.20 NN based on the measurements i did. D:43.8mm H:8mm and the keyless work but haven`t got time to do the reasearch.So please comment if you know anything about it.Runs great but missing the original hour and minute hand and one wrong srew holding the movement in place.It`s not a high end watch but i like these old movements and the research around them.
 
Posts
14,330
Likes
41,291
Circa 1917-18, so well over 100 years old. A quite substantial movement, very reliable, but not highly adjusted. 15 jewel model, plenty of them made, and they appear frequently here on the pocket watch thread. The dial is vitreous enamel, and as is often the case, it shows some hairlines, the result likely of falls, or major bumps. It would look a lot better with a cleaning while you have it off the watch. I am confused by the case colour shown in your photos, but I assume it is nickel silver. A copper/nickel alloy, with no silver content in the alloy.
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
I agree with your conclusions, the lack of keyless works on the dial side indicate a NN.
Brevet 26513, "Advanced pendant winding and time setting mechanism" was issued to Societe Anonyme Louis Brandt & Frere in September 1903.

The movement number and case number date the watch to ca 1918.
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
I wouldn't be surprised if that is an original moon hand
I agree, however Omega referred to them as "Empire" hands, as they also did with the "Empire" numerals on this dial.
 
Posts
22
Likes
13
Circa 1917-18, so well over 100 years old. A quite substantial movement, very reliable, but not highly adjusted. 15 jewel model, plenty of them made, and they appear frequently here on the pocket watch thread. The dial is vitreous enamel, and as is often the case, it shows some hairlines, the result likely of falls, or major bumps. It would look a lot better with a cleaning while you have it off the watch. I am confused by the case colour shown in your photos, but I assume it is nickel silver. A copper/nickel alloy, with no silver content in the alloy.
Yes its a nickel/copper alloy i think looks green/grey.I will shine it up after i get the right hands.And not a original moon hand(dond`t know what that is but its just one i had laying around and it`s to big anyway😅)
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
And not a original moon hand
Close match to an Empire hands, maybe of a smaller caliber?
 
Posts
14,330
Likes
41,291
I’ve also heard that hand style called “Breguet”.
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
I’ve also heard that hand style called “Breguet”.
I think Breguet was the original user of that style and many references use this term.
I suspect Omega wanted to avoid using another watchmakers terms and came up with their own.

Although now that Swatch Group now own Breguet, Omega could use the term without fear.

😉

 
Posts
22
Likes
13
It`s the crystal that`s all scratched up so the dial looks verry bad.It looks good,there is small chip on the top but not visible under the crystal
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
Good result. Vitreous enamel dials can be cleaned (taking due care, a new crystal and hands and this will be a looker.
 
Posts
22
Likes
13
Thanks for the replys its getting late here in norway😴🥱
 
Posts
16,438
Likes
34,635
This hand is the right one but not the right size.
As the watch dates to 1918 I would think Breguet/Empire hands would be contemporary.
The simpler leaf hands seem to appear around the late 1920 to 1930 or so.
However, AJTT shows both styles existing about 1930, so who knows.