Calling All 1963's...

Posts
1,910
Likes
5,716
Considering a birth-year watch within the next year and as such have been deep-diving YouTube + The Lord Google for Omegas from 1963.

Can I see what forum members here have from the year 1963?
 
Posts
1,910
Likes
5,716
Yeesh, I put this in the wrong sub-forum... apologies.
Could a Mod/Admin re-home this over to Vintage?
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,939
1963 can be a very expensive year for Omega, even more so for Rolex. It all comes down to your budget of course
 
Posts
1,910
Likes
5,716
Below is a thread showing a handful of watches from this year. You'll find in that thread that it can be quite pricey, as @JwRosenthal stated- depending on what you are looking for.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/watches-from-the-year-1963.132070/

What exactly are you joking for? Tool or dress watch?

No joking ;-) just looking... for now, both dress and tool.
More window shopping than anything else while trying to educate myself on the different calibres and designs offered.
 
Posts
386
Likes
1,747
This is vintage 1963, which also happens to be my birth year. Good luck on your search!
 
Posts
1,910
Likes
5,716
This is vintage 1963, which also happens to be my birth year. Good luck on your search!

Stunner! Absolutely beautiful!
 
Posts
1,694
Likes
1,652
There's a 1963 Rolex Air King listed for sale now in the Marketplace-Private Watch Sales forum.
 
Posts
963
Likes
1,250
1963 can be a very expensive year for Omega, even more so for Rolex.

Care to expand on this? Does 1963 command higher prices in relation to the years immediately before and after?
 
Posts
154
Likes
639
kkt kkt
There's a 1963 Rolex Air King listed for sale now in the Marketplace-Private Watch Sales forum.

This is a banging watch IMO, if I hadn't purchased so many watches this year I would have snapped it up!
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,231
This is a banging watch IMO, if I hadn't purchased so many watches this year I would have snapped it up!
He sold another 1963 Air-King last year that had a rivet bracelet and was in similar condition. I am still kicking myself over that one.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,939
Care to expand on this? Does 1963 command higher prices in relation to the years immediately before and after?
It’s the era not year specific. SM300’s, Speedy’s and Connie’s from this period tend to be among the most valuable. Not your fault you were born during the hot-hot-hot period of sport watchmaking.
Birthyears of ‘69-‘72 (me) get some groovy options (hello Speedy MkII) that aren’t as eye watering for prices, but we lose the Classic Connie’s (although I do love my C-case).
All that said, there are some awesome Seamasters and Geneve’s around ‘63 in the Omega lineup that won’t cost you a mortgage payment.
If you widen the field from Omega (and steer waaaaay clear of Rolex divers/chronos), there are some awesome values out there from ‘63 from brands like Zodiac, Bulova, JLC, UG, Hamilton, Longines, Tissot, etc.
Getting the year nailed is hard for many (Bulova did use a date code on their watches which makes it very easy) but there are some visual cues when you get to know the watches that can help narrow the range.
Collecting birth year watches can be a very fun treasure hunt…depending on year you were born. ‘77-late 80’s….not much out there for those guys unless you like gold plated quartz poop.

I should also say, if money isn’t an object, then you are in the prime year for some of the coolest watches on the planet.
 
Posts
963
Likes
1,250
I've never bought into the birth year thing, just a huge fan of midcentury/modern design in general. I go fishing for the best condition and never sweat the exact year.

Here are my '63 Seamaster, '66 KSK, and recently sold '69 Geneve: