Forums Latest Members

Cal. 343 RG with central second (SC)? / Rotor discussion

  1. dr.strangelove Mar 16, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    Hey guys!
    Need your help with that one:

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1950s-Omeg...e=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
    s-l1600.jpg
    - having done a little bit of research for the early bumper movements, in my understanding, the early calibers never came with a SC, but always with a subsecond. Earliest caliber with a SC in my mind is 350. Right or wrong?
    - also, I've been seeing a couple of Ref/cal. mismatches on eBay recently. It seems the 2577 and 2576 refs are quite popularl cases mismatched with the 343 cal. Right or wrong?

    Cheers!
     
  2. dr.strangelove Mar 16, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    oh, forgot the best thing about this dial: OFFICIALLY CERTIFIE.......... :)
     
  3. tdn-dk Mar 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,548
    Here is the family tree:

    upload_2018-3-16_17-33-59.png
     
  4. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Mar 16, 2018

    Posts
    12,629
    Likes
    29,961
    Center seconds RG would be a cal 352, so something isn't right here.
     
  5. dr.strangelove Mar 16, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    Is it possible to operate a SC dial with a sub second movement?
     
  6. pippy Mar 17, 2018

    Posts
    1,386
    Likes
    23,147
    Nice looking watch though.
     
  7. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Mar 17, 2018

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,227
    Only with a modification.
     
  8. Rman Mar 17, 2018

    Posts
    2,416
    Likes
    9,563
    Movement, case, and dial from 3 different watches AKA FrickinFranken
     
    felsby likes this.
  9. dr.strangelove Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    A month ago, I would have been the silly fool paying >880 EUR for this one. Thanks to this forum, I am leaning back now and enjoy the hunt... :)
     
  10. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    I think that the movement is a cal. 352 with a replaced bridge. Therefore dial, movement and case go together. I also think that the dial was harshly cleaned at one time, which would explain the missing letters.

    I find that the simplest explanation is usually the best.
    gatorcpa
     
    Willem023 and TNTwatch like this.
  11. TNTwatch Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Also a replaced rotor. Serial is very high for both 343 and 352. Dial too thoroughly cleaned with all the lume gone as well.

    Must be something special with all those bidders ;)
     
    ConElPueblo likes this.
  12. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    Maybe, maybe not. There were some cal. 352 that did not have the chronometer language in the rotors. Although with a 13M serial number, you are probably correct.

    No way to know for sure.
    gatorcpa
     
  13. TNTwatch Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    That on a 343, yes. On a 352, I'd say never (meaning franken until proven otherwise).
     
  14. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    I have a cal. 352, pre-1950. Serial 11.5M. It didn’t have the chronometer language on the rotor. I replaced it with an engraved version when I had the chance. I was told by some very astute collectors at that time they can come either way.

    Even Omega could not confirm or deny.

    Never say never with vintage Omega.
    gatorcpa
     
  15. dr.strangelove Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    sorry for the noob question: by "chronometer language" you guys mean the "adjusted five (5) positions and temperature", right?
     
  16. mac_omega Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    yep
     
    dr.strangelove likes this.
  17. M'Bob Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    6,408
    Likes
    18,221
    Except that ref. 145.022 did not come with a cal. 321...
     
    Archer and dr.strangelove like this.
  18. TNTwatch Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Not sure why Omega wouldn't confirm or deny in your case, but officially, the 333, 343 and 352 should always have the rotor with chronometer language. The part lists for these calibres specify specifically different rotor than those non-chronometers.

    Screenshot_20180318-152907.png
     
  19. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    AC685D22-DCCA-4590-873E-C40DF43AD96A.jpeg

    And look at the rotor on this ad.

    C5D6B65D-E6A5-4203-B3B1-80B3656B8EA3.jpeg

    Avoid using words like “always” and “never”. Omega did a lot of weird things in the 1950’s.
    gatorcpa
     
  20. dr.strangelove Mar 18, 2018

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    40
    Here is another probably basic question for the pros:
    Not sure if I am seeing ghosts, but there seems to be different wording for the 28.10 RA JUB vs. the 343 RG:
    - ADJUSTED FIVE (5) POSITIONS AND TEMPERATURE (28.10 RA JUB)
    - ADJUSTED FIVE (5) POSITIONS AND TEMPERATURES (343 RG)
    weird.jpg
    (Ref is from Desmond Guilfoyle).

    Isnt't that really weird? I mean from a grammatical standpoint, the singular version should really be wrong, because these movements are supposed to be adjusted not just at five positions and 1 temperature, but also at 5 temperatureS ?!? Were the guys in Biel in a hurry 1948 to get the 100 year movement just in time? Seriously? I don't understand it, so anyone chiming in here for help would be much appreciated :)