Bulova Astronaut oddity

Posts
66
Likes
49
Hello all..thought id post images of a bit of a Frankenstein I've purchased (but im not complaining).A non running Accutron Astronaut, looks like the series 2 dial font with hands that look correct , listed as 1964 but movement is a 1961 , and not stamped as an Astronaut 214..just plain 214.The bracelet is a 2nd edition stamped Bulova logo coffin link with some wear.The case back does not show an M stamp with year digit so j think its an original case to 1960-1 with its original Accutron movement but in a redial Astonaut...id like someone to correct me on all this if im wrong as im no expert.Ittl be £250 to have this serviced which ill be having done.Ive wanted one for a very long time but prices have been very high, the seller said it would need a service so that doesn't upset me...nor TBH am I upset that its a mismatch..let's be fair,all originalspace views were technically tampered watches and I've bought my fair share of vintage watches which had non factory parts to keep them ticking.Im going tk look forward to wearing it.
 
Posts
66
Likes
49
As a follow on ..its stamped 214 and not 214hn but it must have been factory modded to have the GMT hand.It is stamped USA on the movement so it can't be a Swiss one
 
Posts
3,951
Likes
11,027
Great watch! I would contact Rob Berkavicius for a service. He is the best around and cheaper than that price by quite a bit.

My M3 says hi.
 
Posts
6,187
Likes
21,186
That's a stunning dial.

Your analysis seems sound. Bracelets are the easiest explanation, as they are easily and often swapped, especially for a sought after coffin style.

Movements could be swapped simply because they quit working and watchmakers will have to find parts from other working movements to keep these alive.

The caseback is a little harder to explain, not having a year. I'm curious to learn what others say.

Another source is this guy: https://accutrononly.com/
 
Posts
66
Likes
49
Thank you for you'd replies , im in the UK and its going down to a gent called Alan Lazarus in Croydon, I've read reviews and he comes highly recommended, I've spoke to him about its mismatched parts and as he said, alot have been altered over the years to keep them running, which isn't an intentional move to deceive.
 
Posts
3,951
Likes
11,027
Your watch has been around for sixty odd years. Who knows what your watch has been through over the years.

My example didn't come with a bracelet, a few years ago I bought one of the new Forstner Komfit bracelets. If I could find a 60s coffin link that didn't cost more than what I paid for the watch I would snap it up in a heart beat. Mine also has a mov't from 1964 in it that was likely a service mov't. Who knows what happened with the original mov't? It's just one of the mysteries of collecting old watches.

I am a little intrigued by your caseback, but I do not think anyone was trying to deceive anyone with your watch. I'd be happy to own that one, wear it in good health.
 
Posts
66
Likes
49
Many thanks Waltesefalcon, yes as you say..having the original 2nd edition stamped Kreisler bracelet is enough to buy the watch anyway.Ive seen some at the £500 mark for really good condition ones...they are certainly less common than the JB Champion ones which were issued over a longer period..the watch cast £620, which i am more than happy with and the service will be £250 probably with VAT ,so fully serviced less than £1,000 all in..the dial is in fantastic shape.
 
Posts
6,187
Likes
21,186
Your dial demonstrates why the Astronaut is so attractive. I've owned several over the years. After seeing yours I'm regretting not having one.

 
Posts
66
Likes
49
hi Waltesefalcon..am i correct in thinking the lume on my and your watch is radium..its got that pale toffee colour the same as other watches in my collection
 
Posts
3,951
Likes
11,027
hi Waltesefalcon..am i correct in thinking the lume on my and your watch is radium..its got that pale toffee colour the same as other watches in my collection
Possibly so, I'm not certain when Bulova quit using radium.