Bond SMP 2531.80 Automatic vs 2541.80 Quartz: Which to Keep

Posts
1,317
Likes
1,329
TL;DR - I’m keeping one Seamaster Professional 300m for daily wear, should it be the 2531.80 automatic or the 2541.80 quartz?

A few months ago I posted a thread asking for opinions as to whether the 41mm Omega Seamaster Professional 300m fit my ~7 inch wrist. After a few months of deliberation I finally decided I wanted the 41mm Seamaster to be my daily watch.

Now I have a second dilemma: I own two 41mm SMP’s from the 90s, the automatic 2531.80 and the quartz 2541.80. I plan to make one my daily wear watch and the other will be sold. I’d like to get opinions here even though I think I know what the advice will be. As background, both watches have been fully serviced in the last year with new dials, bezels, hands, crowns, and gaskets installed. Yes, I even had the dials replaced as I wanted an SMP as new as possible.

My head says keep the quartz 2541.80 that was worn by Pierce Brosnan in GoldenEye. It’s accurate (running +4 seconds per MONTH). It’s also durable, is always set to the right time, is always set to the right date, and has the jumping hour hand for traveling different time zones or handling a daylight savings time change. It’s still a Bond watch (which is meaningless to many but important to me).

My heart says keep the automatic 2531.80. It has even more Bond credibility as it was worn by Brosnan in the three Bond movies after GoldenEye. Perhaps most importantly, I feel like I’d have to turn in my watch enthusiast card if I wore a quartz watch every day. Watch enthusiasts wear mechanical watches! It would be a like car driving enthusiast choosing an automatic transmission over manual for a sports car.

I will add this detail, keeping both is not an option I’m going to choose. I’m trying to reduce the amount of stuff I own so having both is counter to that—especially when the watches are visually nearly identical. I want to choose one watch and wear it nearly every day. I should also add that if I chose the quartz SMP I still have other mechanical watches I can wear, such as my favorite watch, the Longines Conquest Heritage Limited Edition 1954-2014, which is 35mm with an acrylic crystal. But given that most days I’m wearing casual short sleeves (I live in Arizona), a 35mm dress watch is not an ideal choice for every day wear. I will also say that resale value of the two watches is not a consideration. This is about simplifying my collection and my life--it's not an economic necessity.

So what’s your opinion? Can I still be in the cool kids club if I wore a quartz watch every day? Should I choose nostalgia over practicality? I’d love hear what other OF members say.
 
Posts
2,561
Likes
2,745
I'd go 2531.80 every day of the week. Both are obviously great watches. BUT would your heart feel 'happy' if you sold the automatic? IF it were me, every time I put it on I would 'feel' it was wrong.

You can obviously still be in the 'cool kids' club, but I have never found a time where listening to my head over my heart ever made me long-term happy.
 
Posts
1,720
Likes
5,336
Pictures would help, but am I correct in thinking they share the exact same design?

Does the slimmer profile of the quartz, vs the heavier slightly thicker auto mean anything to you. That could be a factor.

As fkr the auto v quartz in general if we're effectively looking at the same watch, to me thee days it wouldn't really matter, both have their for and against. 10 years ago I'd have been mechanical every day of the week, but as I've gotten older I'm really not fussed and will happily wear either, although I do own more mechanical still.

Good luck.
 
Posts
1,317
Likes
1,329
Pictures would help, but am I correct in thinking they share the exact same design?

Does the slimmer profile of the quartz, vs the heavier slightly thicker auto mean anything to you. That could be a factor.

As fkr the auto v quartz in general if we're effectively looking at the same watch, to me thee days it wouldn't really matter, both have their for and against. 10 years ago I'd have been mechanical every day of the week, but as I've gotten older I'm really not fussed and will happily wear either, although I do own more mechanical still.

Good luck.

The two are visually identical with these exceptions: (1) the automatic has the word "Chronometer" on the 6 o'clock side of the dial (quartz is 3 lines of text on the bottom, auto is 4 lines of text); 2) the quartz ticks one time per second and the auto is 8 ticks per second--or 28,800 vibrations per hour; (3) the auto measures 11.7mm thick, the quartz measures 11.3mm thick. The only difference is in the caseback thickness, the midcase and bezel is the same for both.

While the quartz is technically thinner, they are both on the thin side for a 300m diver and on the wrist the difference is basically unnoticeable. For me, any dive watch under 13mm is perfectly acceptable. I once owned the 2220.80 SMP that is 12.8mm and that was perfectly fine for me in terms of thickness.
 
Posts
107
Likes
153
Personally, I'd keep de 2531.80.

If it is really your daily watch, it would keep time and date accurately since it's always going to be winded.

Plus, there's always the fact it's an auto vs quartz. Both are great options, but mechanical watches have a little something more for me.
 
Posts
137
Likes
118
I'd keep the mechanical version over quartz every single time. Pretty sure I'd never even acquire the quartz version unless someone gifted it to me.😀
 
Posts
155
Likes
130
I'd keep the Goldeneye. I have one in good condition. I've taken the battery out of it, had it cleaned. It's now in storage. I'm wearing the Summer Blue SMP300, which in my personal opinon is the upgrade of my Goldeneye.
Edited:
 
Posts
10,738
Likes
16,717
The two are visually identical with these exceptions: (1) the automatic has the word "Chronometer" on the 6 o'clock side of the dial (quartz is 3 lines of text on the bottom, auto is 4 lines of text); 2) the quartz ticks one time per second and the auto is 8 ticks per second--or 28,800 vibrations per hour; (3) the auto measures 11.7mm thick, the quartz measures 11.3mm thick. The only difference is in the caseback thickness, the midcase and bezel is the same for both.

While the quartz is technically thinner, they are both on the thin side for a 300m diver and on the wrist the difference is basically unnoticeable. For me, any dive watch under 13mm is perfectly acceptable. I once owned the 2220.80 SMP that is 12.8mm and that was perfectly fine for me in terms of thickness.
Not quite otherwise identical. One other often overlooked difference is that the date box is noticeably closer to the centreline on the quartz than on the auto, leading to a larger lume index. It’s a subtle thing but it is a thing.

I can’t help you with this dilemma because I’ve never really been able to solve it myself. There have been times when I’ve owned only autos but then usually acquire a quartz SMP of some kind to mess us the purity of an auto only collection. To go with my autos at present I have a Black 2nd Gen quartz which is a great grab and go or travel watch. I also have the auto of the same. I’ve had a 1st Gen 2541.80 like you before too and they are just as handy.

One I really admire is the third gen ceramic bezel quartz but unlike the auto those are pretty rare and I’ve never had one. The sword hand 2264 and 2265 quartz models are great too so the dilemma isn’t limited to the Bond style. You are fortunate or perhaps sensible that you have limited your choice to one style, that of the Bond 1st Gen.

Good luck with your decision. They are both great so there are no wrong answers just the one that works for you. Or course you know what I consider the real solution…
Edited:
 
Posts
762
Likes
2,274
Personally would keep the 2531.80, have an affinity for it as it was what started my watch journey. First watch I ever bought, was my daily driver for years. Movement is bullet proof.

I can see the simplicity with the quartz movement as it's keeps ticking and keeps great time.

Best of luck with your decision.
 
Posts
40
Likes
27
TL;DR - I’m keeping one Seamaster Professional 300m for daily wear, should it be the 2531.80 automatic or the 2541.80 quartz?

A few months ago I posted a thread asking for opinions as to whether the 41mm Omega Seamaster Professional 300m fit my ~7 inch wrist. After a few months of deliberation I finally decided I wanted the 41mm Seamaster to be my daily watch.

Now I have a second dilemma: I own two 41mm SMP’s from the 90s, the automatic 2531.80 and the quartz 2541.80. I plan to make one my daily wear watch and the other will be sold. I’d like to get opinions here even though I think I know what the advice will be. As background, both watches have been fully serviced in the last year with new dials, bezels, hands, crowns, and gaskets installed. Yes, I even had the dials replaced as I wanted an SMP as new as possible.

My head says keep the quartz 2541.80 that was worn by Pierce Brosnan in GoldenEye. It’s accurate (running +4 seconds per MONTH). It’s also durable, is always set to the right time, is always set to the right date, and has the jumping hour hand for traveling different time zones or handling a daylight savings time change. It’s still a Bond watch (which is meaningless to many but important to me).

My heart says keep the automatic 2531.80. It has even more Bond credibility as it was worn by Brosnan in the three Bond movies after GoldenEye. Perhaps most importantly, I feel like I’d have to turn in my watch enthusiast card if I wore a quartz watch every day. Watch enthusiasts wear mechanical watches! It would be a like car driving enthusiast choosing an automatic transmission over manual for a sports car.

I will add this detail, keeping both is not an option I’m going to choose. I’m trying to reduce the amount of stuff I own so having both is counter to that—especially when the watches are visually nearly identical. I want to choose one watch and wear it nearly every day. I should also add that if I chose the quartz SMP I still have other mechanical watches I can wear, such as my favorite watch, the Longines Conquest Heritage Limited Edition 1954-2014, which is 35mm with an acrylic crystal. But given that most days I’m wearing casual short sleeves (I live in Arizona), a 35mm dress watch is not an ideal choice for every day wear. I will also say that resale value of the two watches is not a consideration. This is about simplifying my collection and my life--it's not an economic necessity.

So what’s your opinion? Can I still be in the cool kids club if I wore a quartz watch every day? Should I choose nostalgia over practicality? I’d love hear what other OF members say.
The James Bond thing wouldn't be something I thought about, but I'd go with the quartz all day, every day. Just cheaper and easier to own. I wish they offered a quartz Speedmaster or Sub as that's what I'd have.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,317
Likes
1,329
One I really admire is the third gen ceramic bezel quartz but unlike the auto those are pretty rare and I’ve never had one.
I'm not aware that any ceramic bezel quartz versions exist in 41mm. Is there a reference number?
 
Posts
10,738
Likes
16,717
I'm not aware that any ceramic bezel quartz versions exist in 41mm. Is there a reference number?
Not sure. I am working on that assumption since there was definitely a Mid sized ceramic bezel Gen 3 (ie a SMPc minus the c!).

I will do a bit of digging, if there isn't one it may explain why I considered it so rare!
 
Posts
10,738
Likes
16,717
A quick google suggests that there was never a quartz 3rd Gen in either size. Perhaps my addled mind is recalling that the SMPc was the last to be available as a mid size as well as full and that is the version which is super rare as it is not seen often and perhaps it's lack of success is why Omega only make the 4th ie current version in full size with no intermediate option.

It seems I already own the last quartz SMP so I can stop looking. Sorry for the digression all.
 
Posts
3,262
Likes
9,810
Quartz is very practical for everyday use, but since the reason for me having a mechanical in the first place is that my last quartz started mis behaving, I would probably go with the mechanical.

Quartz is even thinner, is it not?
 
Posts
1,317
Likes
1,329
Quartz is very practical for everyday use, but since the reason for me having a mechanical in the first place is that my last quartz started mis behaving, I would probably go with the mechanical.

Quartz is even thinner, is it not?
It is, but barely. Maybe 0.4mm. For a thick watch that might make a big difference but when the auto is 11.8mm and the quartz is 11.4 the change is negligible. Put another way, I've never once thought the auto was too thick, and I'm pretty sensitive to thickness.
 
Posts
1,317
Likes
1,329
A quick google suggests that there was never a quartz 3rd Gen in either size. Perhaps my addled mind is recalling that the SMPc was the last to be available as a mid size as well as full and that is the version which is super rare as it is not seen often and perhaps it's lack of success is why Omega only make the 4th ie current version in full size with no intermediate option.

It seems I already own the last quartz SMP so I can stop looking. Sorry for the digression all.
No worries. I'm actually kind of glad the ceramic quartz doesn't exist. I might have been tempted to track one down.