OllieOnTheRocks
路Hello Omega Forums!
I am going through my collection, and am going to be thinning it out, by separating the wheat from the chaff so to speak.
Now that I am a member of this great resource, I thought this might be a good opportunity to go through some of my watches and gather people's opinions on authenticity and the like.
So this brings me to a beautiful watch of mine. The fourth watch I had ever bought going back 4 years now.
It's in a beautiful 18k case with unusual unpolished rose gold lugs. But I always thought that the dial might be a refinished example, simply because it is in remarkable shape.
I did quite a bit of research and found a good few examples with the same lugs, but none with this dial. Similar dials, but not this one, so it's hard to compare. Some examples of what I found are below:
The bottom example confirms the lugs to be authentic, whilst the top two are very close dial matches to mine. Albeit with different hands. Another curve ball of course is that mine appears to be double signed with Chronograph Suisse under Baume & Mercier, which I have only been able to find two examples:
The second one whilst positions of the texts are different, has the same or similar Alpha hands as mine, so could point these to being original also. Here's another example with Alpha hands.
Whilst none of these are the same as mine, it could point to the parts at least being authentic to the brand, but with very little material (that I seem to be able to find) it's really hard to say, so any other opinions would of course be useful.
Also, does anyone have any idea as to the age of such a watch - I have no idea. It's a Landeron movement as far as I am aware, but I cannot find a database anywhere for serials for either this or B&M. It does have number on the caseback but I do not know what this relates to, on the inside it is engraved Baume and Mercier only, whilst on the outside it is stamped 18K gold, and beneath this it reads: 73 and beneath that, 627706.
Look forward to hearing any ideas!
Ollie 馃榾
I am going through my collection, and am going to be thinning it out, by separating the wheat from the chaff so to speak.
Now that I am a member of this great resource, I thought this might be a good opportunity to go through some of my watches and gather people's opinions on authenticity and the like.
So this brings me to a beautiful watch of mine. The fourth watch I had ever bought going back 4 years now.
It's in a beautiful 18k case with unusual unpolished rose gold lugs. But I always thought that the dial might be a refinished example, simply because it is in remarkable shape.
I did quite a bit of research and found a good few examples with the same lugs, but none with this dial. Similar dials, but not this one, so it's hard to compare. Some examples of what I found are below:
The bottom example confirms the lugs to be authentic, whilst the top two are very close dial matches to mine. Albeit with different hands. Another curve ball of course is that mine appears to be double signed with Chronograph Suisse under Baume & Mercier, which I have only been able to find two examples:


The second one whilst positions of the texts are different, has the same or similar Alpha hands as mine, so could point these to being original also. Here's another example with Alpha hands.

Whilst none of these are the same as mine, it could point to the parts at least being authentic to the brand, but with very little material (that I seem to be able to find) it's really hard to say, so any other opinions would of course be useful.
Also, does anyone have any idea as to the age of such a watch - I have no idea. It's a Landeron movement as far as I am aware, but I cannot find a database anywhere for serials for either this or B&M. It does have number on the caseback but I do not know what this relates to, on the inside it is engraved Baume and Mercier only, whilst on the outside it is stamped 18K gold, and beneath this it reads: 73 and beneath that, 627706.
Look forward to hearing any ideas!
Ollie 馃榾