Basel 2018 - New Longines Military Watch

Posts
521
Likes
2,572
Isn't the aim of vintage collectors, ultimately, to get as clean examples as they can get? Of course, if the best preserved example of a 1940s watch is one with spots and discoloration, as opposed to other examples that are totally degraded, that is considered a great and rare find.

But this is not a rare vintage watch. They nailed it with the Conquest and Flagship Heritage in the sense that you could get a brand new watch that was (almost) the same as 60 years ago -- how it must have felt for someone in the 50s to buy a Conquest then. My question was, why would a collector want a new watch (not rare, not special) with dirt on the dial... It's just bordering on the Emperor's clothes to me. Hadn't expected this from Longines.



Why? Why? Because they know they have two potential clienteles. The first half are the people who buy and love the Hydroconquest and the Equestrian lines, and who could not care less about the Heritage line.
And then the people who might like the Heritage line.
Except when their historians talk to vintage lovers, those vintage lovers tell them: forget about us so long as you create those shiny cold things with date windows; we like watches that have traces of life in them, color, scratches and banged up straps.
Who send them pictures of the JLC Homage to Deep Sea alarm as a model of a modern reeditiion which vintage lovers will actually buy.
So if this is a reedition it will be an interesting test.
And I'm curious how well the Heritage 1945 worked out, that so called salmon dial 'calatrava" style watch modeled after Ben Clymers watch. But I somehow doubt whether the Swatch Group would reveal sales figures.
 
Posts
1,687
Likes
5,124
Basel 2020: Watch comes in a faux uncle's tin can.

Basel 2024, watches come not working requiring a service and replacement parts which are optional extras.
 
Posts
1,228
Likes
3,791
Tet Tet
Basel 2024, watches come not working requiring a service and replacement parts which are optional extras.

I think this sums up why I buy modern reissues instead of vintage quite nicely. 😉
 
Posts
885
Likes
2,974
Isn't the aim of vintage collectors, ultimately, to get as clean examples as they can get? Of course, if the best preserved example of a 1940s watch is one with spots and discoloration, as opposed to other examples that are totally degraded, that is considered a great and rare find.

But this is not a rare vintage watch. They nailed it with the Conquest and Flagship Heritage in the sense that you could get a brand new watch that was (almost) the same as 60 years ago -- how it must have felt for someone in the 50s to buy a Conquest then. My question was, why would a collector want a new watch (not rare, not special) with dirt on the dial... It's just bordering on the Emperor's clothes to me. Hadn't expected this from Longines.

I typically prefer some even patina on my vintage watches. So I disagree that vintage collectors inevitability want pristine examples.

Part of me likes the story behind the aging - so you’re correct in suggesting this watch wouldn’t have that story. But the second and more pertinent part is that I like the aesthetic, which this watch attempts to capture.
 
Posts
1,687
Likes
5,124
I’ve always been on the fence about faux Latona and aging. I find it visually appealing but conceptually gimmicky.

So I don’t know where my mind will land on long term but purely as a reaction to the visual....Well done!!

Share your divided opinion, I can certainly understand people not liking the principal or effect of this false ageing but at the same time I do find it rather attractive and feel it wouldn't look nearly as nice with a perfect plain dial.
 
Posts
493
Likes
1,066
I really wish that had done this and the Heritage 1945 with hand wound movements more true to their originals.
 
Posts
127
Likes
172
Tet Tet
Basel 2024, watches come not working requiring a service and replacement parts which are optional extras.

LOL

I’ve never had a problem with faux patina, I see it simply as a nice color. But the spotting is a little too much for me.
 
Posts
1,889
Likes
8,157
LOL

I’ve never had a problem with faux patina, I see it simply as a nice color. But the spotting is a little too much for me.
Yet I like them. I wonder if any other brand has ever attempted this earlier. Let’s see the watch and then comment on the aesthetics of the product. Somehow I feel it will look good on wrist. Yes I agree that a hand wound movement would be a period correct caliber and would have added the look and feel of the vintage vibes better.
 
Posts
1,008
Likes
2,119
I have a feeling that in 10-15 years, we will be looking back at this faux patina trend and thinking: "How in the world did that become a thing?"
 
Posts
1,560
Likes
4,419
LOL

I’ve never had a problem with faux patina, I see it simply as a nice color. But the spotting is a little too much for me.
+1
 
Posts
11,962
Likes
39,410
Tet Tet
Basel 2024, watches come not working requiring a service and replacement parts which are optional extras.

Now THAT is a classic Tet offensive™!
 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,428
6b's aren't that difficult to source. And for those who shy away from them due to size, the '56 recase is a perfect alternative.

Amen.



Though smaller cousins do have their attractions...
 
Posts
255
Likes
732
^ I go back and forth on this. I'm pretty vintage loyal, but some of these are either really expensive, tough to find, or both. And I think for the majority of buyers (i.e. not OF types), the vintage world and how to find, authenticate, and complete the transaction is daunting. All for a watch that they may not be confident in wearing everyday or would sleep better at night knowing had a warranty since they don't have a trusted watchmaker, or really even understand or want to understand all that (should) go with vintage ownership.

And from that standpoint, Longines is executing these very well and delivering to that segment perfectly.

I totally agree with you here. Several brands have been talking out certified pre-owned. If you look at last years Big Eye, this one, the Seamaster 1948, etc it almost seems like Swatch Group's answer to the certified pre-owned might be to release more vintage styled watches minus all the initial barrier to entries for a newcomer. The industry's objective right now is to try to get as many people back into watches in any way possible. Making the leap from no watch, to a fine watch as easy as possible is probably critical. Once buyers are hooked, comfortable with the ownership of a fine watch, all sorts of posssobilities open up for the brand.

I for one have been hesitant to pull the trigger on a my first vintage buy for the same reasons you mentioned. I do plan to do one this year, but after rummaging through the forums for a almost a year now.
 
Posts
127
Likes
172
I totally agree with you here. Several brands have been talking out certified pre-owned. If you look at last years Big Eye, this one, the Seamaster 1948, etc it almost seems like Swatch Group's answer to the certified pre-owned might be to release more vintage styled watches minus all the initial barrier to entries for a newcomer. The industry's objective right now is to try to get as many people back into watches in any way possible. Making the leap from no watch, to a fine watch as easy as possible is probably critical. Once buyers are hooked, comfortable with the ownership of a fine watch, all sorts of posssobilities open up for the brand.

I for one have been hesitant to pull the trigger on a my first vintage buy for the same reasons you mentioned. I do plan to do one this year, but after rummaging through the forums for a almost a year now.

I think it’s great that you’re biding your time. Not only will you be more informed, but I’ve found my tastes have evolved more as I’ve seen more of what’s out there, seeing things later that fit me better.

Some unsolicited advice, try on as many watches as you can as well if you aren’t already, see what works for you in the metal.
 
Posts
255
Likes
732
I think it’s great that you’re biding your time. Not only will you be more informed, but I’ve found my tastes have evolved more as I’ve seen more of what’s out there, seeing things later that fit me better.

Some unsolicited advice, try on as many watches as you can as well if you aren’t already, see what works for you in the metal.

Agreed. My biggest issue is that is not something I feel too comfortable with but wish I did. When I go into stores I just look around closely but try not to bother bother the sales person if I am not sure I am moving forward since I don’t want “waste their time”.

As far as tastes goes, you are totally right. It’s surprising that certain watches I wouldn’t have looked at twice are bringing to look interesting.

Which makes me think: should I just sell them when I no longer want one or just keep and wait a bit longer to buy the next. Still “building a personal watch strategy” as a personal framework to allow me to make better desicions.
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,675
Am I the only one who thinks that the hour and minute hands look as if they are from two different watches? The styles clash big time, IMO.

I don't know if Longines followed a different pairing tradition than Omega, but here's their take on hands styles:

ome1954hanbw.jpg
(from Ofrei.com)

Of course, it might be that Longines is simply ahead of the curve and has introduced watches with fake franken-parts in them on top of fake patina 😁
 
Posts
7,293
Likes
76,565
Which makes me think: should I just sell them when I no longer want one or just keep and wait a bit longer to buy the next.
Good question.

That would be a personal decision. I've found that sometimes my taste in a vintage watch will come full circle. A watch that I bought a year or two ago that I lost favor with, suddenly becomes wonderful again!

Am I the only one who thinks that the hour and minute hands look as if they are from two different watches?
With ya.

Did someone screw up?

I think it would look better anyway with the leaf hands. BOTH 😁
 
Posts
510
Likes
1,912
These hands made me mad when I saw them the first time.
Artifical patina + mismatching hands = Big mistake