- Posts
- 787
- Likes
- 6,745
Zman4eva
路As I'm diving deeper into the Constellation rabbit hole, I find myself actively avoiding movements that don't have a date quickset function. I rotate watches in my collection and sometimes don't get to wear a watch until a week later. This leads to watches with the incorrect date quite frequently. I find that adjusting to the correct date has become a time consuming endeavor so I just pick another watch to wear. This leads to watches that just sits in my watch box/roll unworn for weeks until the date gets closer.
Knowing all this, I've come to the conclusion that movement without a quickset function might be a deal-breaker for me (ie - cal 561). I much rather have a 564 movement so that it's actually wearable.
What's everyone's thoughts?
I'm not a big fan of watchwinders. They're expensive and take up too much space. Maybe I should just stick with no-date Constellations and keep it simple.
Picture to keep things interesting. I haven't worn the 14902 on the right since January.
Knowing all this, I've come to the conclusion that movement without a quickset function might be a deal-breaker for me (ie - cal 561). I much rather have a 564 movement so that it's actually wearable.
What's everyone's thoughts?
I'm not a big fan of watchwinders. They're expensive and take up too much space. Maybe I should just stick with no-date Constellations and keep it simple.
Picture to keep things interesting. I haven't worn the 14902 on the right since January.
Edited:
