Zman4eva
·As I'm diving deeper into the Constellation rabbit hole, I find myself actively avoiding movements that don't have a date quickset function. I rotate watches in my collection and sometimes don't get to wear a watch until a week later. This leads to watches with the incorrect date quite frequently. I find that adjusting to the correct date has become a time consuming endeavor so I just pick another watch to wear. This leads to watches that just sits in my watch box/roll unworn for weeks until the date gets closer.
Knowing all this, I've come to the conclusion that movement without a quickset function might be a deal-breaker for me (ie - cal 561). I much rather have a 564 movement so that it's actually wearable.
What's everyone's thoughts?
I'm not a big fan of watchwinders. They're expensive and take up too much space. Maybe I should just stick with no-date Constellations and keep it simple.
Picture to keep things interesting. I haven't worn the 14902 on the right since January.
![IMG20240118105238.jpg IMG20240118105238.jpg](https://omegaforums.net/data/attachments/1755/1755463-7207569204357abbf1273ec9a64c2763.jpg?hash=cgdWkgQ1er)
Knowing all this, I've come to the conclusion that movement without a quickset function might be a deal-breaker for me (ie - cal 561). I much rather have a 564 movement so that it's actually wearable.
What's everyone's thoughts?
I'm not a big fan of watchwinders. They're expensive and take up too much space. Maybe I should just stick with no-date Constellations and keep it simple.
Picture to keep things interesting. I haven't worn the 14902 on the right since January.
![IMG20240314205703~2.jpg IMG20240314205703~2.jpg](https://omegaforums.net/data/attachments/1755/1755464-4806391613bbb62568245d31feb3eac0.jpg?hash=SAY5FhO7ti)
![IMG20240118105238.jpg IMG20240118105238.jpg](https://omegaforums.net/data/attachments/1755/1755463-7207569204357abbf1273ec9a64c2763.jpg?hash=cgdWkgQ1er)
Edited: