Autowinding—probably a dumb technical question

Posts
1,651
Likes
2,408
On a watch that’s a bit stiff to wind—say an Aqua Terra with two barrels—how can the rotor keep it wound?

To explain my meaning: I’ve had a few Omegas over the years where it’s required some real torque to wind them up. This seems especially true of the modern 2-barrel movements. Compared to other automatics and manuals I’ve owned, these watches are tough to wind—perhaps not helped by the fact that Omega crowns aren’t always the grippiest, but the stiff winding is more than a matter of grip.

The watches I’m referring to are automatics and the winding rotor does work, keeping them wound when worn regularly. What’s confusing me is how that small spinning weight is able to wind the spring/s when I have so much trouble winding the watch manually.

I’m no watchmaker or engineer, so I’m guessing this is a silly question. But it’s piqued my curiosity.
 
Posts
8,710
Likes
14,611
On a watch that’s a bit stiff to wind—say an Aqua Terra with two barrels—how can the rotor keep it wound?

To explain my meaning: I’ve had a few Omegas over the years where it’s required some real torque to wind them up. This seems especially true of the modern 2-barrel movements. Compared to other automatics and manuals I’ve owned, these watches are tough to wind—perhaps not helped by the fact that Omega crowns aren’t always the grippiest, but the stiff winding is more than a matter of grip.

The watches I’m referring to are automatics and the winding rotor does work, keeping them wound when worn regularly. What’s confusing me is how that small spinning weight is able to wind the spring/s when I have so much trouble winding the watch manually.

I’m no watchmaker or engineer, so I’m guessing this is a silly question. But it’s piqued my curiosity.
How does your wrist manage it?
 
Posts
1,651
Likes
2,408
How does your wrist manage it?

Well, I suppose that's another way to ask the same question: how does a tiny little rotor (that weighs what, a few grams?) generate the same winding torque that requires such effort from my fingers, even with the gross leverage of a "tool" as large as the "ratchet" formed by my thumb and index finger?

Or does the rotor wind the spring/s via a mechanism that somehow requires less torque than crown-winding does?

An annotation to what I'm claiming here about the tough winding.
 
Posts
16,737
Likes
35,088
...........................

Or does the rotor wind the spring/s via a mechanism that somehow requires less torque than crown-winding does?

.....................


It's all in the gears (or actually, the ratios).
 
Posts
1,651
Likes
2,408
That does make sense. Tiny winding stem whose torque has to be re-angled vs the direct orientation and placement of the rotor…
 
Posts
21,674
Likes
49,127
As @JimInOz noted, the rotor is geared down dramatically, and requires many turns to store the same amount of power as one turn of the stem. It's leverage, not angle or placement. To make a bicycle analogy, the rotor is in a low gear and the stem is in a high gear.
 
Posts
8,710
Likes
14,611
Well, I suppose that's another way to ask the same question: how does a tiny little rotor (that weighs what, a few grams?) generate the same winding torque that requires such effort from my fingers, even with the gross leverage of a "tool" as large as the "ratchet" formed by my thumb and index finger?

Or does the rotor wind the spring/s via a mechanism that somehow requires less torque than crown-winding does?

An annotation to what I'm claiming here about the tough winding.
Sorry, totally misread what you were asking. I thought you were asking about autowinders, not automatic movements.
 
Posts
8,710
Likes
14,611
My subject-line created that confusion.
Yeah! It's your fault I have reading comprehension issues.
 
Posts
1,651
Likes
2,408
Yeah! It's your fault I have reading comprehension issues.

Well, I gave you lousy reading to miscomprehend. It was a conspiracy.