Attempting to educate myself on possible first entry into Omega Vintage.

Posts
3
Likes
0
Hello,

I am new to the forum. I recently purchased my first watch, Omega DeVille Tresor Ref. 432.53.40.21.02.001. I am now interested in purchasing a vintage Omega. I found an 1965 Omega Seamaster Ref. 166.037, Cal. 562, and am trying to educate myself. I was hoping I could maybe get some opinions on the watch I am considering buying. Below is the link. I appreciate any thought or suggestions you may have. Thank you for your time.

 
Posts
95
Likes
64
I am not a big expert in De Ville, but the watch looks good to me, I like it. I see no red flags from the posted photos. It is difficult to assess the price, I think it is reasonable. If the buckle is original Omega, it is a plus, I have not much experience with those, it looks modern to me. I am sure other experts will pitch in.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,034
Likes
2,792
Hi, 166.037 is a bit smaller, only 34mm. Is that OK for you?
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hi, 166.037 is a bit smaller, only 34mm. Is that OK for you?
That’s a fair point. I know vintage watches are smaller, but is 34mm especially small for a men’s vintage watch?
 
Posts
2,644
Likes
5,330
34 average for vintage. 32 small. 36 large. Nice looking watch.
 
Posts
715
Likes
2,142
Welcome! Looks nice! I like this style of lugs, and a plain steel Seamaster is a real classic.
Edited:
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
34 average for vintage. 32 small. 36 large. Nice looking watch.
Thank you for that information. It definitely helps provide some context.
 
Posts
33,032
Likes
37,807
That looks like a nice example, Cal 562s are extremely solid and dependable movements that last a long time when properly serviced, its a nice thin case too on that references that fits under a dress shirt cuff very well.