If I consider a bracelet then it doesn't need to compete with the watch for attention. Quite a few bracelets these days are elaborate. I guess I don't want too much icing on the cake.
Was there a time when the strap was considered more dressy and formal and the bracelet was considered more casual and sporty?
ALWAYS
Apparently a generation hasn't received word of this.
I'm out of style on the few occasions I make an effort to be in style. No one in my locale notices a watch at all so couldn't care less about new/vintage or brand. I dabble in them for my own amusement. A few years back though and in another city, someone of a younger generation who was manning a counter of a shop dealing in sunglasses, did mention that I needed to lose the nice exotic black strap on a '50s Glycine 18kt gold watch I was wearing and install a gold bracelet in order to "dress it up more."
I've owned one Waltham before. It was the one that Dexter wears in the TV show, and it was a huge pain to find!
Well, I guess there's no accounting for taste but typically dress watches are always on leather, crock, etc. Bracelets where typically for utilitarian and tool watches for obvious reasons, Nato etc wjere alternatives to steel. Gold, platinum and other precious metals cane at the time people started to use tool watches as dressy, and tool watches started to get the prestige and design elements to go with that trend. In truth, these days anything goes, but bespoke elegance always to me still leans towards straps.
[emoji108][emoji106] excellently out, Sergio.
I like both. I prefer dressier watches on leather and casual tool watches on bracelet. It also gives a wider variety of looks. I tend to change most of mine around pretty regularly though. My Speedy Reduced gets runs on bracelet, black and brown leather and my vintage connies on leather tend to switch colour but the SMPc will stay on mesh and my SM300 will stay on the 1171 bracelet.
From a comfort point of view I think I prefer bracelet (except in the case of the shitty bond bracelet)
You don't like the Bond bracelet? I thought that was commonly thought as one of the most comfortable bracelets out there! Granted it is a very busy bracelet, I think it's beautiful. Just my two cents on it.
I'm still on the fence on that one. I think it would be better on a simpler bracelet but at this point it's part of the identity
You don't like the Bond bracelet? I thought that was commonly thought as one of the most comfortable bracelets out there! Granted it is a very busy bracelet, I think it's beautiful. Just my two cents on it.
I'm going to San Francisco over my spring break! I'm super excited. I have always wanted to see California.
Eat at John's Historic Grill in the Union Square area. Excellent filets!
Well, maybe I'll have to rethink it, haha. Apparently they make the best cinnamon rolls in San Fran.
Any good watch shops you could recommend? I'd like to try on a 16570 before I really consider buying one.
hqmilton is a fantastic vintage shop. Be sure to give them a call and let them know you are coming around, and they (usually Jacek) will be eager to help out. Lots of Rolex and Omega, but also other classic pieces. Check out their website (http://www.hqmilton.com/) to pre-drool...uh, pre-shop. SF is one of my favorite places to visit; save plenty of time for checking out Fisherman's Wharf area-great food there too!!
I am definitely a leather/hide/NATO strap guy, but the Speedys are on their original bracelets, I agree with Northernman, bracelets can be too cold in our climate in the winter, but perfect for the warm summers.