Forums Latest Members
  1. peire06 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    585
    Likes
    281
    To All Speedy Masters,

    Does this Speedy look okay to you? Anything wrong? What's the reference of that model?

    Thanks for info.

    peire06

    095906_ff933353c8031a7374d07e406afd23e9_normale.jpg
     
  2. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    It would be nice to see more photos, back , inside of back , movement.
     
  3. peire06 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    585
    Likes
    281
    Unfortunately that's the only pic I have so far. Wanted to have Speedy Masters' views on the case, dial and hands.
     
  4. Vercingetorix Spam Risk Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    3,268
    Likes
    5,257
    Speedmaster, not Speedy.
     
    BenBagbag likes this.
  5. peire06 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    585
    Likes
    281
    I know. I was referring to the Masters of Speedy.
     
  6. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,993
    I think he's trying to bait the Masters...
     
    oddboy likes this.
  7. Ninja2789 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    488
    Likes
    691
    So a Master Baiter?
     
    efauser and peire06 like this.
  8. bama2141 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    562
    Likes
    1,239
    Looks like a Speedmaster 176.0012. Has the Lemania derived Omega 1045 movement. Looks pretty original albeit a bit rough. The centrally located chronograph seconds and minutes hands are great features.

    IMG_3951.JPG

    IMG_3956.JPG
     
  9. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Hopefully you have access to more pics or can see the watch in the metal. Looks like a bit of the sunburst finish is still there, but need to see the case from a few angles. Definitely want to see the movement and the inside of the case back. One thing to be aware of is that these movements have some plastic parts that are No Longer Available and if you need one, they are very hard to come by... Notably the date support.

    Other than that, not horrible, but I don't like the missing lume at 10. I think you could find better without too much effort.
     
  10. peire06 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    585
    Likes
    281
    Thanks Bama2141. I noticed that the small hand in 12 o’clock subdial in your picture is in the 9 o’clock sundial in the picture I posted and vice versa (hand in your 9 o’clock subdial is used in the 12 o’clock sundial in mine).
     
  11. bama2141 Oct 19, 2017

    Posts
    562
    Likes
    1,239
    After checking the images of this watch on Google it would appear that those hands were somehow reversed on your sample at some point in the past. Easily fixed I’d say.