Any Info on this Watch ?

Posts
9
Likes
11
I found this watch with my father's belongings many years ago. I do not know if it is a real Omega. It is not an automatic but must be wound up. It works very well, is a bit fast, increasing time by 30 seconds a day. Amazing for a watch that has been in a drawer for so many years. Any info will be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Posts
1,511
Likes
4,749
reference 2254 I believe.
I think maybe some connection to the RCAF during WW2 but someone will be along soon who knows what they are really talking about.
Cheers, Michael
Edited:
 
Posts
708
Likes
1,237
That is really rather lovely, is it a Techron? I wouldn't have the movement running too much with that loose radium from the hour hand floating around in there. Congrats on your inheritance.
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
reference 2254 I believe.
I think maybe some connection to the RCAF during WW2 but someone will be along soon who knows what they are really talking about.
Cheers, Michael
Thanks !
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
That is really rather lovely, is it a Techron? I wouldn't have the movement running too much with that loose radium from the hour hand floating around in there. Congrats on your inheritance.
How dangerous is this ??
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
V Voivod
How dangerous is this ??
The concern is that it would make its way into the gears. Take is to a watchmaker and have it removed.
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
reference 2254 I believe.
I think maybe some connection to the RCAF during WW2 but someone will be along soon who knows what they are really talking about.
Cheers, Michael
Thank you !
The concern is that it would make its way into the gears. Take is to a watchmaker and have it removed.
Thank you.
 
Posts
3,414
Likes
7,322
Firstly its not a Techron which has a very different case.
Secondly its not a ref 2254 although the case marking says so - it is a cross-reference 2337 which has an 18J movement inside while the 2254 has a chronometre movement. Omega missed on amending the embossed ref.# 2254 when using up left over cases and so causes errors when collectors try to assess this model. When you order an EoA using solely the movement serial# you will receive the correct ref# 2337 on your extract.
This topic has already been discussed several times...
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
Firstly its not a Techron which has a very different case.
Secondly its not a ref 2254 although the case marking says so - it is a cross-reference 2337 which has an 18J movement inside while the 2254 has a chronometre movement. Omega missed on amending the embossed ref.# 2254 when using up left over cases and so causes errors when collectors try to assess this model. When you order an EoA using solely the movement serial# you will receive the correct ref# 2337 on your extract.
This topic has already been discussed several times...
Thanks for the info.
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
At 5, is that a piece of the lume from the hand?

Yes it is.

The hands do not illuminate in the dark, if they are radioactive, they should still illuminate, no ?
 
Posts
888
Likes
2,989
Nice momento of your father. If you're going to stick around you'll need an avatar. Voivod, it's got to be this:
 
Posts
21,729
Likes
49,299
V Voivod
The hands do not illuminate in the dark, if they are radioactive, they should still illuminate, no ?

Very nice watch and a great heirloom. The hands and dial are definitely radioactive (radium has a very long half-life), but they will no longer be luminous because the phosphor has degraded over time. This is standard for watches of this age.
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
Otherwise, it seems to be a fantastic watch.
Thanks
Very nice watch and a great heirloom. The hands and dial are definitely radioactive (radium has a very long half-life), but they will no longer be luminous because the phosphor has degraded over time. This is standard for watches of this age.
Thanks. I figured there must have been an explanation.
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
Nice momento of your father. If you're going to stick around you'll need an avatar. Voivod, it's got to be this:
Haha it's a good one