- Posts
- 305
- Likes
- 485
amuscare87
·Even though it’s an 8220, not a 1502? I thought they were produced later.
And to add, I thought dogleg Connie’s typically came on 7 row BOR not 5 row
Advice1962 Constellation full set especially good results
And to add, I thought dogleg Connie’s typically came on 7 row BOR not 5 row
- Posts
- 3,578
- Likes
- 13,519
MtV
·Yes, 7-rows are typical on doglegs. That‘s @Davidt s and my point. He’s just saying that some might have been equipped with 5-rows by the ADs, too, so they’d also be „original“. We’re on the same page that they’re still not as good a fit as the 7-rows.
The earliest 5-rows were sliding clasp examples that regularly weren’t stamped. The earliest #11 endlinks also were not stamped.
Then came 1502/11s, of which also 3010 exists. But that’s the most modern incarnation.
The earliest 5-rows were sliding clasp examples that regularly weren’t stamped. The earliest #11 endlinks also were not stamped.
Then came 1502/11s, of which also 3010 exists. But that’s the most modern incarnation.
- Posts
- 13,519
- Likes
- 23,457
Davidt
·Even though it’s an 8220, not a 1502? I thought they were produced later.
However, I haven’t seen anything that gives a timeline for the various bracelet codes, 5 row or 7 row other than what you’ve already said about Endlinks.
My gut feeling is that being an 8220 makes it less likely its original as I assume these are a later reference but I don’t know if that’s actually the case
