Forums Latest Members
  1. Snowman Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    528
    Hi,
    Still looking for a nice 343 rg and was offered this looks a very nice clean example
    Wondering what others with more experience think



    5A3BCDC5-CC0D-49D9-ABEB-FE4FBF1FC68C.png 182BF12F-F489-418D-BCDE-7A09CD2A728F.png
     
    Dr No and balaja like this.
  2. seekingseaquest Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    2,338
    Likes
    6,176
    I don’t like the lume.. it’s possible that’s natural discoloration but I think more likely some kind of re-lume or other inlay.

    Dial looks good but would like to see a photo without the hand obscuring the text. Case is nice. Movement is nice.
     
  3. DaveK Yoda of Yodelers Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    4,188
    Likes
    11,876
    The regulator seems to be making a run for it, so I assume this is being sold as "needs a service"
     
  4. Snowman Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    528
    Not sure on that if you zoom up the image the indicator looks central to me,also another photo of the dial


    B6AFBFDD-BD4A-4491-BE6F-5D3B3DA6DD63.png 58E917FA-A1CE-4473-B2F5-72B54C7FA1CB.png
     
    TimeODanaos likes this.
  5. DaveK Yoda of Yodelers Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    4,188
    Likes
    11,876
    I’m not a watchmaker, I don’t even portray one on TV. So smarter people will weigh in. But, the regulator arm (the whatchamacallit) is heading the direction of the red arrow, and a serviced watch would have it on or near center where the blue arrow is shown. DA159F18-70D9-4194-873A-FA79861D991B.jpeg
     
  6. VetPsychWars Wants to be in the club! Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    1,862
    Not exactly. Ideally the pointer would be centered, but there is no pointer, because this is a chronometer and it has fine regulation. The piece where your red arrow is, that's the point where the balance spring's pivot point is, it's in more or less the right spot.

    So what you see here is perfectly fine and there is nothing to be concerned about.

    Tom
     
    Dr No, felsby, TimeODanaos and 2 others like this.
  7. DaveK Yoda of Yodelers Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    4,188
    Likes
    11,876
    Interesting. Thank you Tom.::book::
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 20, 2019

    Posts
    12,205
    Likes
    15,720
    Snowman likes this.
  9. Snowman Nov 21, 2019

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    528
    Thanks for the assistance so far,l have looked at several of these while researching ,and I thought I was onto something this time,looking at the thread on omega calibres am I correct in thinking only 1000 of these 343 rg seamasters were made as a single consecutive run in 1950 or have I not understood this correctly
    I know the seller well having purchased very successful from him in the past ,so was reasonably confident of his initial description
    but a piece like this is never going to be bargain basement stuff and it’s good to have support of more experienced members
    If I pull the trigger on this one I will let you know
     
  10. Snowman Nov 21, 2019

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    528
    No issues with the case reference 2766-3 I have been looking around and not come across a 343rg in this
     
  11. TimeODanaos Nov 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,568
    Likes
    3,226
    I had to stop looking at your photos after a while - this watch is beautiful, and I wouldn't care whether the dial was 101% original: if it isn't, somebody made a superb job of it. I do hope you bag this! :)
    FWIW, my read of the official calibres list is that 5,000 343s were made, starting in 1949, and of those, there was a production run of 1,000 that happened in 1950 "(dont 1000 numéros consécutifs en 1950)" Yours looks like 1950 (according to the serial no. table that you posted here ;) a while back), so bingo! (Btw mine hails from 1949 (11.5m xxx) - it's ref 2518 and has no "Seamaster" branding on the dial).
     
    Edited Nov 21, 2019
  12. Snowman Nov 22, 2019

    Posts
    269
    Likes
    528
    Hi,
    Finally pulled the trigger on this one :):):) from the limited numbers out there I think I would have had a very long wait before anything much better might have turned up
     
    seekingseaquest and ChrisN like this.
  13. TimeODanaos Nov 22, 2019

    Posts
    1,568
    Likes
    3,226
    Nice one! :cool: :thumbsup:
     
    Edited Nov 24, 2019