Advice for bracelet for Speedmaster 105.003

Posts
2,844
Likes
2,437
I'm not the right guy to tell you if this is it. Not to worry as those that can tell you will.

However I can tell you to make sure it will fit your wrist as extra links may be more than you think. That is if you can find them.
 
Posts
88
Likes
126
are you looking for just "a bracelet" or are you looking for an era-appropriate/authentic bracelet? Era-appropriate bracelets are going to be expensive. Alternatively, you could get an 1125 bracelet and 617 end links from Ofrei for less http://www.ofrei.com/page1280.html
 
Posts
572
Likes
419
are you looking for just "a bracelet" or are you looking for an era-appropriate/authentic bracelet? Era-appropriate bracelets are going to be expensive. Alternatively, you could get an 1125 bracelet and 617 end links from Ofrei for less http://www.ofrei.com/page1280.html

Ideally I would like an era-appropriate bracelet. I like they way they look. However, I have noted your suggestion. Thanks!
 
Posts
11,288
Likes
19,775
That price is extremely high and I don't believe a 1039 was ever originally fitted to a 19mm Speedmaster. This one is just a 20mm bracelet with 19mm endlinks.

By the time the 1039 came in, the remaining straight lugs were fitted with the 1035.

My 105.003 came with its original 1035 and I think these are cheaper than the 7912.

You could always try a JB Champion!
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
According to MWO, the most correct bracelet is the 7912/6 for the 105.003/ 63 and 64.
The 105.003/65 was sold with the 7912/6, 1501/6 , 1035/6 and 1035/506.
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
No matter what the seller on eBay says, the 1039 bracelet is incorrect for the 105.003. The 1039 is designed for 20mm end links of the 105.012 and 145.012.
 
Posts
172
Likes
297
Other than clasp, what were the major differences between the 7912, 1501, and 1035?
 
Posts
20,211
Likes
46,878
Other than clasp, what were the major differences between the 7912, 1501, and 1035?
The reference mumber.